Page 129 - Fiber Fracture
P. 129

114                                                 A. Sayir and S.C. Farmer

               surfaces failed to show twins. The tensile strength values reported here are very high.
               Therefore, the expected twin  size is beyond the resolution of  SEM and  may  require
               transmission electron microscopy (TEM) characterization to resolve the question of their
               occurrence.
                  The tensile  strength of  (111) Y3A15012  was moderately high,  3.4f0.8  GPa, but
               considerably less  than A1203. The fractographic analysis of  the  fibers revealed that
               low-strength fibers had  a  stress concentration associated with  [lo01 planes along the
               fiber axis, Fig. 2B.  The occurrence of  these stress concentrations was sensitive to the
               pull-rate during crystal growth. Y3A15012 has  160 atoms per unit cell (A1203 has  12)
               and thus a sluggish crystallization process. Due to the high viscosity and low thermal
               conductivity of the Y3A15012 melt the changes in tangential temperature gradient along
               the free surface of the melt did not readily initiate instabilities. The significance of these
               physical characteristics of  the  melt was  twofold.  First, the  meniscus angle does  not
               change readily; therefore, smooth exterior surfaces are produced. Fibers have strengths
                around 3 GPa even though they contain macroscopic facets. This is in strong contrast
                to single-crystal Y2O3, although they both have cubic symmetry. Second, as reported in
                the literature (Caslavsky and Viechnicki, 1980), the Y3Al5O12 system can move toward
                metastable solidification resulting in solidification of perovskite phase with YA103 com-
               position. Fibers grown at faster rates failed mostly from internal flaws of precipitated
                YA103 phase as determined by  X-ray and Raman spectroscopy analysis. Hence,  any
                attempts to increase pull speed for high volume production are technically not viable.
                  From the foregoing discussion of the fracture characteristics of single-crystal fibers,
                it is apparent that single-crystal A1203 and Y3Al~012  are possible candidates for load
                bearing applications. Yet, Y3A15012 cannot be produced in an economically practical
                manner due to sluggish crystallization kinetics and hence is not a viable reinforcement
                for structural composites that require a considerable amount of reinforcement, Hence,
                Y203 and Y3A15012 are most attractive for sensors, waveguides, and laser host types
                of  functional  applications  where  the  amounts  of  fiber material  required  are  lower.
                Accordingly, with the emergence of single-crystal A1203 fibers as the more promising
                candidate for reinforcing fibers in structural applications, the strength of A1203 fibers at
                elevated temperatures needs to be studied for high-temperature use.

                Fracture Strength of (0001) Alto3 Fibers at Elevated Temperatures

                  Single-crystal  (0001) A1203 fibers  with  room  temperature  strengths of  6.7  GPa
                exhibit strengths at  1400°C of  (1  GPa. This reduction in strength may be due to the
                decrease of the material resistance to crack propagation, that is, the decrease in fracture
                toughness  KI, with  increasing temperature. However, this  would require a  dramatic
                decrease of  Young’s  modulus and/or  a  substantial decrease in  the  surface energy of
                sapphire. Young’s modulus of single-crystal A1203 decreased monotonically with a very
                small slope as a function of temperature. The modulus at  1450°C was only  10 to 14%
                less than the room temperature value. Since the relative decrease in the elastic modulus,
                -(T/E)(dE/dT),  for  A1203 is  not  profound,  the  decrease of  other  thermodynamic
                properties with increasing temperature is not expected to be large enough to account for
                the dramatic decrease of tensile strength at elevated temperatures.
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134