Page 131 - Fiber Fracture
P. 131

116                                                  A. Sayir and S.C. Farmer

                               800
                                                     4
                               600    00          Stress Hupture
                                                Stable Crack growth

                               400


                               200
                                                           Safe Stress
                                 0
                                    0       50       100      150     200

                                                        Time to Failure, h
              Fig 4. Stress rupture time of single-crystal  (0001) A1203  as a function of applied stress at  1400°C (vacuum
              lo-'  atm.).  Circles  represent  the  time  to  failure  at  fracture  and  squares represent  experiments  typically
              interrupted  at 100 h or more without fracture.


              system (environment, temperature and material), there is a unique relationship between
              crack growth velocity, v, and crack tip stress intensity factor, KI. For each condition,
              it is necessary to derive an empirical relation for these factors. The approach originally
              developed by Wiederhorn to describe slow crack of ceramics is used here (Wiederhorn,
              1968):

                 v = VOWI/KIO)"                                                     (1 1
              where Klo is the threshold stress intensity factor below which crack growth is negligible
              (VO < lo-''  m/s),  n is an empirical constant, and VO is the crack velocity at KI = KIo.
              For lifetime prediction under constant stress conditions, it has been shown that Eq. 1 can
              be used to predict the time to failure, tf, by the relation:



              where KI~ and  KIf  are the initial and final values of  the stress intensity factor. Y  is a
              geometric factor that depends on the flaw shape, orientation, location, and on the nature
              of the applied stress field. The solid line designated as 'dynamic loading' in Fig. 4 was
              calculated with Eq.  2  using  KI~ = 0.75 MPa m-'/'  and  VO = lo-''  m/s,  n = 10 for
              1400°C which are taken from previous work (Sayir, 1993).
                 The uncertainty, however, arises if one compares the dynamic failure strength with
              static loading. The large scatter of  lifetimes at constant stress is a direct result of  Eq.
              1 where slow crack growth rate changes substantially with small changes in KI. From
              Eq.  1 to  Eq.  2  it  was  assumed that  the  factor  Y  is  invariant during  flaw  growth  to
              simplify the integral. The fact that failure may be initiated by different types of flaws in
              different fibers should not be ignored. The uncertainty further increased by our limited
              understanding of the physical phenomena controlling fracture at elevated temperatures.
              Although  single-crystal  A1203  has  been  well  studied,  the  microscopic  mechanisms
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136