Page 287 - Fiber Fracture
P. 287

270                                                          J.W.S. Hearle













                           -
                    ~~~~~~~                                            ~~~~~
                        Fig. 4. Staudinger’s (1933) view of the continuous structure of an oriented polymer.


                  For finite molecular-weight polymer, a model drawn by Staudinger (1933), remains
                valid as an ideal structure (Fig. 4). This brings in the first factor to reduce stiffness and
                strength, slippage at the ends of  molecules. This is a feature extensively studied at the
                larger scale of whole fibres for short-fibre composites and textiles. Strength is reduced
                by  a slip factor, which takes account of the loss of tension from the free ends of the
                fibres or molecules up to the limiting state in the middle of components, where they are
                fully gripped. The slip factor has a greater effect when the bonding between components
                is weak and when the aspect ratio of the components is small. A simple presentation of
                the theory by Hearle (I 982, p.  103) indicated that the stress at a given strain would be
                reduced by a slip factor S given by:
                  s = (1 - &K/#m)                                                    (1)
                where  K is the  ratio of  shear-bonding stress between  molecules to tensile stress in
                molecules, p  is  the  aspect  ratio  of  a  polymer  repeat  unit  and  N is  the  degree  of
                polymerisation. With the high molecular weights used in HM-HT fibres this effect will
                be small.
                  Two other factors, which influence stiffness and strength, are the degree of orientation
                of molecules and disorder in molecular packing. Although mean orientation angles can
                be determined, the detail of the departures from the ideal structure of Fig. 4 is an area
                of  uncertainty. Diagrams drawn by  different researchers (Fig. 5) give different views
                of  structure. The pictures, which are attempts at a two-dimensional representation of
                what the stmcture might be despite the lack of adequate experimental evidence, show up
                contrasting ideas. Fig. 5a-c  suggest regions where the crystal lattice is perfect, separated
                axially and transversely, by zones of disorder. Fig. 5d-f  are para-crystalline models with
                a low level of uniform disorder. Fig. 5g suggests a distribution of local defects in the
                crystal lattice. My own view is that disorder might be due to defects associated in larger
                groups than indicated in Fig. 5a. What is needed to solve these problems is a large-scale
                exercise using all available methods of  experimental structural analysis linked to 3-D
                computer modelling of  putative structures. Fig.  5h  represents a  larger-scale, regular
                disorientation in  Kevlar, which  shows up  as banding in  optical microscopy between
                crossed polarisers.
                  As  a first  approximation, orientation reduces stress by  a factor equal to the  mean
                value of cos40, where 8 is the angle between the polymer axis and the fibre axis. There
   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292