Page 288 - Fiber Fracture
P. 288

FRACTURE OF HIGHLY ORIENTED, CHAIN-EXTENDED POLYMER FIBRES           27 1





















           Fig. 5. Views of  structure in highly oriented, chain-extended fibres. (a,b) Panar et al. (1983). (c) Jacobs and
           Mencke (1995). (d) Sikkema (2000).  (e) Nakagawa  (1994). (f,g) Hongu  and Phillips (1997). (h) Aramid
           pleat structure (Dobb et al.,  1977).



           are more advanced theories, such as the one of Northolt and van der Hout (1985), which
           brings in the shear modulus. In many HM-HT fibres the orientation is so high that this
           effect is small. The pleated  structure of  Kevlar 29 as first wound up, which is shown
           in Fig. 5h, does cause an appreciable reduction in modulus  and associated creep, but,
           since the disorientation is pulled out under high stress, has little effect on strength. The
           post-treatments  that  increase  modulus  in other types  of  Kevlar cause  little  change  in
           strength.
             The above theory and practice show that the modulus, or more generally the tensile
           stress-strain  curve, of HM-HT fibres can be confidently estimated and can come close
          to the theoretical limit. As mentioned above, the ideal strength of  a  ‘perfect’ structure
           is more difficult to estimate, because it depends  on  the point  of inflection in the free
           energy diagram. In real fibres, it is also necessary to take account of the fact that break
           load is not a central statistic but an extreme value. Strength is therefore dependent on the
           weakest and rarest defects or other forms of  variability. Fracture will start where there
           is a combination of structural weakness and stress concentration, and this will vary with
          the mode of deformation. However, a hypothetical strength that is related to rupture of
          molecules across a plane perpendicular to the fibre axis (and the molecular orientation)
          is not the relevant consideration, though, as suggested below, it may occur as the final
           stage of  rupture over a reduced cross-section. The dominant feature, which influences
           fracture, is the fact that the axial molecular strength is much greater than the transverse
           intermolecular strength. This means that axial splitting occurs much more readily than
           transverse  rupture.  Axial  cracks  manifest  themselves  in  different  ways  in  different
           circumstances  with  different  stress distributions  and histories.  Complete explanations
           would require a more certain knowledge of the fine structure than is indicated by Fig. 5
           and a comprehensive description of any larger defects in the fibres.
   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293