Page 357 - Fiber Fracture
P. 357

FRACTURE OF COMMON TEXTILE FIBRES                                    339















                                                                Strain
             Fig. 6. (a) The observed stress-strain  curve of wet wool. The stress in the middle of the yield region is 0.35
             GPa and the maximum extension is 50%. (b) Predicted stress-strain  curve, thick line marked with arrows,
             based on the composite analysis of Fig.  7.  The independent stress-strain  properties of  the components are
             shown as a-c-eq-b  for the microfibrils (IFs) and M for the matrix.


               Fig. 7 illustrates Chapman’s treatment of  the mechanics of this composite system.
             The  system  is  treated  as  a  set  of  zones  consisting  of  fibril  and  matrix  elements.
             Originally, this  was  introduced as  a  way  of  simplifying the  analysis, but,  the  later
             identification of the links through IF protein tails makes it a more realistic model than
             continuous coupling of fibrils and matrix. Up to 2% extension, most of  the tension is
             taken by  the fibrils, but, when the critical stress is reached, the IF in one zone, which
             will  be  selected due to statistical variability or random thermal vibration, opens from
             a to 6 form. Stress, which reduces to the equilibrium value in the IF, is transferred to
             the associated matrix. Between 2% and 30% extension, zones continue to open. Above
             30%, all zones have opened and further extension increases the stress on the matrix. In
             recovery, there is no critical phenomenon, so that all zones contract uniformly until the
             initial extension curve is joined. The predicted stress-strain  curve is shown by  the thick
             line marked with  arrows in  Fig. 6b. With an  appropriate set of  input parameters, for
             most of which there is independent support, the predicted response agrees well with the
             experimental curves in Fig. 6a. The main difference is that there is a finite slope in the
             yield region, but this is explained by variability along the fibre. The C/H model can be
             extended to cover other aspects of the tensile properties of wool, such as the influence
             of humidity, time dependence and setting.

             Fracture

               On  the C/H  model, the limiting factor is the break extension of  the matrix, which
             is  less  than  that  of  the  fibrils.  Once  the  matrix  has  failed,  the  fibrils  will  come
             under higher tensions and will rupture to give a granular break. Cells may also break
             semi-independently, reflecting the composite of cells bonded by the CMC.
               The tensile strength of  wool  fibres is important because the  fibres are  subject to
             severe forces during the initial stages of processing, when the fleeces are cleaned and
             the fibres are separated into forms that can be spun into yarn. The strength of  wool is
             commonly tested as the  ‘staple strength’, which involves all the complications of  load
   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362