Page 359 - Fiber Fracture
P. 359

FRACTURE OF COMMON TEXTILE FIBRES                                    34 1

                35


                30
                25

              - 20
              0
              U
              5 15

                10

                 5
                 0
                   0     200    400    600     800   1000    1200   1400   1600
                                               CSA (urn2)
           Fig. 8. Break  load of  wool  fibres plotted  against area of  cross-section  at point of  break.  From Woods et al.
           (1990).

             Fig. 8 is a plot of  break load of wool fibres against the area of cross-section at the
           point of  break. The slope of the upper bound line, which is  100 MPa, is a measure of
           the ‘intrinsic strength’ of wool at a break extension of 50 to 60%. The points below the
           line are due to defects of  one sort or another. Some of these will be associated with
           localised damage, but others may have physiological causes associated with the growth
           of the fibres. One suggestion is that weakness in the CMC may cause cells to pull out
           from one another, particularly if they are shorter or thicker with a low aspect ratio.



           MELT-SPUN SYNTHETIC FIBRES

           Structure and Stress-Strain  Curves

             In  contrast  to  the  detailed information on  the  structure of  natural  fibres, there  is
           great uncertainty about the  structure of  the  melt-spun  synthetic fibres, of  which  the
           most important are polyester (polyethylene terephthalate), polyamides (nylon 6 and 66)
           and polypropylene. They are known to be about 50% crystalline, in the sense that the
           density is mid-way between the densities of  crystalline and amorphous material. This
           is  confirmed by  other  analytical  studies.  It  is  also known  that  they  are  moderately
           highly  oriented,  with  the  high-tenacity types,  used  in  technical  textiles, being  more
           highly oriented than those used for apparel. However, this leaves open a great variety of
           possible structures: different sizes and shapes of crystallites, different interconnections
           between crystallites, and  a range of  possibilities from  well-defined crystallites in  an
           amorphous matrix to a uniform structure of intermediate order. Fig. 9 shows some of the
           pictures drawn to give impressions of the likely fine structure, which has a scale of the
   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364