Page 364 - Fiber Fracture
P. 364

346                                                           J.W.S. Hearle

               SOLUTION-SPUN FIBRES

               Structure and Stress-Strain Curves

                  Regenerated cellulose, cellulose acetate, acrylic and some other fibres are spun from
               solution, either by dry spinning, with evaporation of solvent, or by  wet spinning into a
               coagulation bath. In viscose rayon, the solute is sodium cellulose xanthate, which is a
               chemical derivative of  cellulose soluble in caustic soda, so that a chemical reaction is
               involved in fibre formation.
                  There  is  structural  uncertainty  similar  to  that  for  the  melt-spun  synthetics. The
               fibres are partially crystalline and partially oriented. The density and other analyses of
               regenerated cellulose fibres indicate an effective crystallinity of about 33%. The method
               of  regeneration affects the  structure. In  ordinary  viscose rayon,  there  is  a  micellar
                structure, which could be represented somewhat as in Fig. 9b. Due to the differential
               mobility of sodium and hydrogen ions, the regeneration produces a skin, which has a
               fine texture and is stronger than the core, which has a coarser texture. Modification of
               the chemistry gives higher-strength rayons, which are  'all-skin'.  Other variations give
                high-wet-modulus rayons, which have a fibrillar texture. The newer iyocell fibres, which
                are spun from a solution of cellulose in an organic solvent, also have a fibrillar texture.
                Secondary cellulose  acetate,  with  one  -OH  group  to  five acetate groups,  is  poorly
                crystalline due to the irregularity of  the molecules. More information on  regenerated
                cellulose fibres is given in Woodings (2000). Acrylic fibres are atactic copolymers, with
                a small percentage of a monomer other than acrylonitrile, and the structure is assumed
                to  be  quasicrystalline, with  regions of  locally aligned molecules that  are  not  in  3D
                crystallographic register.
                  In  both  cellulose and acrylic  fibres, there are  strong intermolecular forces in  the
                disordered  as  well  as  the  more  ordered  regions, though  these  are  weaker  than  the
                covalent bonds in the main chains. In cellulose, the cross-links are hydrogen bonds, and
                in acrylic fibres they are polar interactions of the -CN  groups. The stress-strain  curves
                of an acrylic fibre, shown in Fig. 1 1, are typical of these materials. The curves, S, ST and
                W20, at 20°C all show a marked yielding at about 2% extension, when the intermolecular
                bonds in the disordered regions start to break. The upper graph shows that the elastic
                recovery falls off sharply at the same strain. There is a second-order transition at around
                80"C,  when the polar interactions become mobile, and this leads to the low modulus
                and high break extension at 95°C in curve W95. As shown below, viscose rayon shows a
                similar behaviour, except that it is absorption of water, not increase of temperature, that
                results in the low modulus due to the mobility of hydrogen bonds.
                  There has been little analytical modelling of the mechanical properties of this group
                of  fibres. Hearle (1967) treated the wet and dry properties of  rayon fibres in terms of
                the  composite models  shown in  Fig.  12 by  following the  well-known  mixture laws.
                The series structure, Fig.  12a, which is dominated by the soft component, averages the
                strains at the same stress, and the parallel structure, Fig.  12c, which is dominated by
                the  stiff component, averages stresses at the same strain. The stress for the micellar,
                Fig.  12b, form is somewhat arbitrarily placed in a mid-way position. In the wet state,
                Fig.  12d, the  component  stress-strain  curves are  assumed to  be  linear, with  a high
   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369