Page 58 - Fiber Fracture
P. 58

MODELS OF FIBRE FRACTURE                                             43

             chain folds decreases and the structure is more oriented, approaching that of a perfect
             crystal. For example, in ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWE), with a
             drawn ratio of 247, the fibre elastic modulus approached a value of 220 GPa (Kanamoto
             et al.,  1983), which is close to the theoretical modulus of  a perfect crystal (240-290
             GPa) .
               According to all observations it has to be expected that the ultimate properties of
             ultra-highly oriented fibres should depend on the properties of the crystalline blocks and
             on the way these blocks are linked together. Starting from this idea, theJibriZ model has
             been used to predict the mechanical behaviour; this is one of the oldest models and still
             enjoys considerable popularity. Many modifications and improvements have been made
             since then to consider imperfections, degree of crystallinity, molecular weight and so
             on. All these models give reasonable predictions of Young’s modulus, the shape of  the
             stress-strain  curve, and to some extent the yield stress. On the contrary, little progress
             has been made in predicting the ultimate tensile stress, most probably because fracture
             models rely on imperfections and not enough information is yet available to devise a
             general enough model.
               Peterlin (1981) made interesting comments on the rupture of highly oriented aliphatic
             fibres and suggested a phenomenological model of rupture, due to crack nucleation and
             coalescence. The microcracks seem to form primarily at defects of  the  microfibrilar
             structure, particularly at  the  ends  of  microfibrils (see  Fig.  7a).  In  these  places  the
             connection between crystallites by  taut tie molecules is poor and these regions favour
             microcrack nucleation much earlier than the amorphous layers inside the microfibrils.
             The stress concentration resulting from the opening of these microcracks may rupture
             also some of  the adjacent microfibrils. This nucleation and subsequent lateral growth
             of the microcrack ruptures the taut tie molecules in its path. Interestingly, the ruptured
             molecules yield free radicals which can be monitored by  electron spin resonance. The
             failure of the fibre seems to occur when the ratio between the average distance and the
             diameter of the microcracks reaches a value of about 3. This criterion was checked in
             nylon, polyethylene and polypropylene.
               Morgan et al. (1983) also made very interesting phenomenological comments on the
             rupture of aromttic fibres, particularly poly@-Phenylene Terephthalamide) (PPTA), the
             basis of Kevlar . The deformation and failure processes, together with the structure of
             the fibre, were commented in the light of  fracture topography. The authors conclude
             that the chain-end concentration and  its distribution within the fibre are the primary
             structural factors  affecting the  deformation and  failure of  PPTA  fibres, and propose
             the  following model, illustrated in  Fig.  7b.  The rod-like PPTA  macromolecules are
             assumed to be aligned parallel to the fibre axis. The chain ends are arranged essentially
             randomly relative to one another but become progressively more clustered in the fibre
             interior, resulting in periodic transverse weak planes every 200-250  nm, approximately.
             The chain ends cluster in the vicinity of  these weak planes. The fibre core consists of
             cylindrical crystallites, of about 60 nm in diameter, aligned in the fibre direction. The
             fibre exterior is assumed to be less crystalline than the interior. The chain-end model,
             although it  does  not  provide  quantitative results  for  the  tensile  stress, is  consistent
             with the observed deformation and failure processes of Kevlar fibres. Fig. 7c illustrates
             the  path of  a crack that transverses the molecular chain ends of  an array of  aligned
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63