Page 60 - Fiber Fracture
P. 60

MODELS OF FIBRE FRACTURE                                              45

             macromolecules with a skin-core distribution of ends similar to the model; the skin will
             exhibit a more continuous structural integrity in the fibre direction than the core, and the
             core will fail more readily by transverse crack propagation. Panar et al. (1983) proposed
             a similar model. Both emphasise the structural features as observed on etched specimens
             of PPTA fibres, but do not provide a quantitative interpretation of the tensile properties
             of these fibres.
               Yoon  (1990) developed a model for fibre strength similar in reasoning to that of  a
             model  for the tensile strength of  short fibre-reinforced composites due to Fukuda and
             Chou (1982). Both the chain length distribution and chain orientation effects of the fibre
             are included jointly with the molecular weight dependence. The model is based on the
            consideration that the macroscopic load is transferred along the fibre sample mainly
            by  interchain interaction, and the fibre breakage occurs when the interchain interaction
             force exceeds a critical value. Then the chains are separated and fibre failure is caused
            by  the rapid accumulation of  the interchain voids, resulting in  the observed fibrillar
             fracture. The chain ends act as sites for stress concentration and the molecular weight
             dependence of the tensile stress is due to the relation between the number of chain ends
            and the molecular weight. Good agreement with experimental results was obtained for
            wholly aromatic polyesters.
               Another model, along the same line of reasoning, was proposed by NorthoIt and van
            der Hout (1985) and Baltussen and Northolt (1996) based on observations by X-ray and
            electron diffraction. The fibre is considered as being a build-up of  a parallel array of
             identical fibrils. Each fibril consist of  a series of  crystallites arranged end to end, and
            the polymer chains run through these crystallites parallel to their symmetry axes, which
            follow an orientation distribution in relation to the fibre axis (Fig. 7d). The parameters of
            the model are the chain orientation distribution, the average modulus for shear between
            the chains, the chain modulus and a simple yield condition based on the critical resolved
             shear stress. This model provides expressions for the compliance, the elastic tensile
             curve and the yield stress of the para-aromatic polyamide and other high-modulus fibres.
             Recently, Picken and Northolt have extended the model to predict fibre fracture stress
             (Picken and Northolt, 1999), as a function of  the degree of orientational order, making
             use  of  an  expression similar to  the  Tsai-Hill  criterion  for  the  strength of  uniaxial
            composites:




             where a(@) is the rupture stress, 8 the angle between the chain segment and the fibre
             axis, and ZS, a~ an UT are respectively the shear stress, the longitudinal stress and the
             transverse stress of the molecular composite. With this model, the authors find that it is
             possible to explain the effect of  molecular orientation in the strength of  as-spun fibre
             and suggest that for highly oriented aramid fibres, the transverse term can be ignored
            and that OL is about 6 GPa and ts about 0.3 GPa.
               An  alternative theoretical approach  to  exploring  the  limits  of  the  tensile  stress
             of  fibres with  perfectly  oriented and  packed polymer molecules was  developed by
            Termonia et al. (1986; Termonia, 2000). The model bypasses details of the deformation
             on an atomistic scale and focuses instead on a length scale of  the order of the distance
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65