Page 205 - Flexible Robotics in Medicine
P. 205

192 Chapter 7

            With enough pressure difference, the elastomeric membrane will enter and jam the grooves
            of the spring, creating resistance against deformation by external forces (Fig. 7.18B).
            Similarly, when the differential pressure is created when the spring is in a deformed state,
            the jammed grooves will create resistance in the spring from returning to its original shape,
            maintaining its configuration.
            To test our hypothesis, we wrapped a 2.85 mm diameter spring in the silicone membrane.
            Silicone was used instead of latex rubber because of its biocompatibility. Since the spring
            backbone actuating the instrument make direct contact with internal tissues, the silicone
            membrane can function as a dual role in ensuring the biocompatibility of our surgical robot.
            One end of a fluid line is then introduced between the membranes, and the other end is
            connected to a syringe. Negative pressure can be introduced by removing air from between
            the layers using the syringe. Silicone rubber was used to seal the syringe and the
            elastomeric membrane. Upon withdrawing the air with the syringe, we observe that the
            silicone membrane did indeed compress against the spring backbone as expected. However,
            using this technique, we were unable to achieve the desired stiffness. Upon the removal of
            external forces, the “jammed” spring was still able to return to its original deformation.
            Despite entering the grooves of the spring, the elasticity of the silicone membrane still
            conferred enough elasticity for the spring to retain its inherent flexibility.


            7.6.4 Remarks

            Both concepts we have employed and tested have not yielded the desired stiffening and
            response time. Hence, for our future direction, we can further test out the two alternatives.
            First, for the thermal phase-change mechanism, we can test out the concept using solder. As
            solder has a higher thermal diffusivity as compared to wax [5], we can expect a shorter
            activation and inactivation response time as compared to wax. However, we will need to
            conduct mechanical and cycling tests on the solder-based mechanism to ascertain its
            suitability in withstanding multiple cycles of cooling and melting in our surgical robot
            application. We will be attempting granular jamming for our jamming mechanism.
            However, since a substantial amount of granular matter is required for successful jamming,
            it is crucial to consider the weight ratio of the granular matter to the entire mass of the
            instrument prototype. Additionally, methods of integrating the various stiffening
            mechanisms into our prototype, as well as considerations of any possible interference with
            the tendon-driven mechanism, will have to be considered.



            7.7 Conclusion

            We employ a master-slave architecture with a tendon-driven actuation mechanism that
            allows us to achieve the desired miniaturization and functionality for the potential
   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210