Page 206 - Flexible Robotics in Medicine
P. 206

Tendon routing and anchoring for cableriven single-t surgical manipulators 193

               application in minimally invasive osseous tumor removal. Through the project, we have
               built a compact, minimally invasive surgical device. We explored different methods of
               manufacturing the guides as well as studied their effects on the flexibility of the spring stem.
               Manufacturing of the guides at such small dimensions of 3 mm was a challenge, which we
               overcame by designing our own customized set of tools and drilling system. Once the
               complete end-effector comprising of the spring backbone, instrument head, actuating
               tendons, and guides were assembled, the slave-side tools for our device were complete. The
               master-side control architecture was using inputs from the joystick and translating them into
               servo motor commands to move the spring flexibly. A potential improvement now includes
               adding haptic force feedback and additional degrees of freedom, which will add on to the
               functionality of the device. With our robot, we are suggesting the following surgical
               procedure: using a high-power burr, create a small cavity (B15 mm in diameter) on the
               bone surface from the opening created; the robot will be inserted into the cavity for a
               biopsy; direct the robot arm to the tumor site; using the forceps, grab a piece of a tumor and
               cut it with the electrocautery arm.

               Future work can be on four fronts. First, the modularization of the instrument channels
               accommodates the switching of instruments during the surgical procedure. Second,
               improvements can be made to the user interface of our overall system to ensure intuitive
               controls and repeatability of our system. Third, we wish to integrate more degrees of
               freedom into our robotic system. Currently, our surgical instruments are capable of bending
               motions but are incapable of translational and linear motions. Integrating these extra
               degrees of freedom can offer more dexterity and working space for the surgeon during the
               procedure. Lastly, the successful integration of variable stiffness into our system can offer
               better control, accuracy, and efficiency of the surgical procedure.

               Acknowledgments

               This work was in part supported by the National Key Research and Development Program, The Ministry of
               Science and Technology (MOST) of China (No. 2018YFB1307703).


               References
               [1] W. Ricci, P. Streubel, S. Morshed, C. Collinge, S. Nork, M. Gardner, Risk factors for failure of locked
                   plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases, J. Orthop. Trauma 28 (2) (2014) 83 89.
               [2] Z. Li, R. Du, H. Yu, H. Ren, Statics modeling of an underactuated wire-driven flexible robotic arm, in: 5th
                   IEEE RAS/EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2014,
                   pp. 326 331.
               [3] P.M. Loschak, S.F. Burke, E. Zumbro, A.R. Forelli, R.D. Howe, A robotic system for actively stiffening
                   flexible manipulators, in: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and
                   Systems, 2015, pp. 216 221.
               [4] Y. Zhou, H. Ren, M.Q.H. Meng, T.H. Tse, H. Yu, Robotics in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic
                   surgery, J. Mech. Med. Biol. 13 (02) (2013) 1350044.
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211