Page 201 - Flexible Robotics in Medicine
P. 201

188 Chapter 7

            the technique requires prolonged activation and cooling time (on orders of seconds), making
            it too slow for most practical manipulation applications [13,14,16].

            There are two types of jamming techniques, granular/particle and layer jamming. In both
            types of jamming, changes in air pressure are used to modulate the relative shear stress
            experienced between particles and layers that are enclosed by an elastic membrane [17].
            When the air pressure difference inside and outside of the elastic membrane increases, the
            instrument will be more rigid. In granular jamming, an increase in air pressure difference
            inside and outside of the elastic membrane will squeeze the granules together, increasing
            the rigidity of the granular system [9]. Both techniques are found to be able to generate
            drastic stiffness increases without a significant change in external volume. Furthermore,
            there has been a study on using jamming as dynamic haptic force feedback for the surgical
            robot, in addition to its application in variable stiffness. Layer jamming, on the other hand,
            is substantially more complicated to manufacture.



            7.6.1 Design thinking framework

            An effective variable stiffness system for our surgical robot will ideally have short
            activation time, appropriately broad range and magnitude of stiffness, simple to
            manufacture, and the ability to be scaled down to meet the size constraints of our surgical
            robot. Table 7.1 shows how each of the stiffening method fares for different criteria.
            Even though granular jamming ranks higher than the use of thermal phase-change
            materials, we decided to work on thermal phase-change materials and layer jamming due to
            two reasons. First, we decided to place more weight on criteria five as compared to other
            criteria, as it is the main challenge that we face in miniaturizing our surgical robot and
            instrument channels. Taking this into account, the use of thermal phase-change materials
            offers more potential over the use of granular jamming. Furthermore, as our structures are
            small in scale, only a small volume of thermal phase-change material is needed for the

                             Table 7.1: Comparison of various stiffening mechanisms.
                                                           Concept variants
                                                      Thermal
                                      Tunable-stiffness  phase-change  Granular/particle  Layer
             Selection criteria       materials       materials      jamming         jamming
             1 Length of activation time  0           2 1            1 1             1 1
             2 Range of stiffness     0               2 1            1 1             1 1
             3 Magnitude of stiffness  2 1            0              1 1             1 1
             4 Complexity of          0               1 1            0               2 1
               manufacturing
             5 Scalability to small sizes  2 1        1 1            0               1 1
   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206