Page 321 - Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
P. 321

302 Fluid Mechanics, Thermodynamics of Turbomachinery
                          in general, made so that their shafts are orientated vertically, lessening the problem
                          of cavitation occurrence.
                            The cavitation performance of hydraulic turbines can be correlated with the
                          Thoma coefficient,  , defined as
                                  H S   .p a  p v //. g/  z
                                D     D                  ,                                (9.24)
                                  H E          H E
                          where H S is the net positive suction head (NPSH), the amount of head needed to
                          avoid cavitation, the difference in elevation, z, is defined in Figure 9.15 and p v is the
                          vapour pressure of the water. The Thoma coefficient was, strictly, originally defined
                          in connection with cavitation in turbines and its use in pumps is not appropriate (see
                          Yedidiah 1981). It is to be shown that   represents the fraction of the available head
                          H E which is unavailable for the production of work. A large value of   means that a
                          smaller part of the available head can be utilised. In a pump, incidentally, there is no
                          direct connection between the developed head and its suction capabilities, provided
                          that cavitation does not occur, which is why the use of the Thoma coefficient is not
                          appropriate for pumps.
                            From the energy equation, eqn. (9.20), this can be rewritten as

                                            1
                              p a  p 3         2    2
                                        z D   .c 3  c /  H DT ,                          (9.25)
                                                    4
                                 g         2g
                          so that when p 3 D p v , then H S is equal to the rhs of eqn. (9.24).
                            Figure 9.19 shows a widely used correlation of the Thoma coefficient plotted
                          against specific speed for Francis and Kaplan turbines, approximately defining the
                          boundary between no cavitation and severe cavitation. In fact, there exists a wide
                          range of critical values of   for each value of specific speed and type of turbine
                          due to the individual cavitation characteristics of the various runner designs. The
                          curves drawn are meant to assist preliminary selection procedures. An alternative
                          method for avoiding cavitation is to perform tests on a model of a particular turbine
                          in which the value of p 3 is reduced until cavitation occurs or, a marked decrease in
                          efficiency becomes apparent. This performance reduction would correspond to the
                          production of large-scale cavitation bubbles. The pressure at which cavitation erosion
                          occurs will actually be at some higher value than that at which the performance
                          reduction starts.
                            For the centre-line cavitation that appears downstream of the runner at off-design
                          operating conditions, oscillations of the cavity can cause severe vibration of the
                          draft tube. Young reported some results of a “corkscrew” cavity rotating at 4 Hz.
                          Air injected into the flow both stabilizes the flow and cushions the vibration.

                            EXAMPLE 9.6. Using the data in Example 9.3 and given that the atmospheric
                          pressure is 1.013 bar and the water is at 25 ° C, determine the NPSH for the turbine.
                          Hence, using Thoma’s coefficient and the data shown in Figure 9.19, determine
                          whether cavitation is likely to occur. Also using the data of Wislicenus verify the
                          result.
                            Solution. From tables of fluid properties, e.g. Rogers and Mayhew (1995), or
                          using the data of Figure 9.20, the vapour pressure for water corresponding to a
   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326