Page 342 - Fluid-Structure Interactions Slender Structure and Axial Flow (Volume 1)
P. 342

322               SLENDER STRUCTURES AND AXIAL FLOW


                                                                                       I
                                                                                       I
                                                                            i
                                                                                       I
                                                                                       I
                                                                                       I
                                                                              ‘Snap’
                                                                                        \
                                                                                        I
                                                                                        I
                                                                                        I
                                                                                        I
                                                Load                                    I  I  I
                                                                                        I
                                                                                        I
                                                     I-!  e    1:             I   I   I   I l l c
                                                      -
                                                  I
                           0
                                                  15             20              25
                                                            MUZl/k
                      Figure 5.14  The  development  of divergence  for  a pipe  with  N  = 2, kl  = k2  = k, 11 = 12 = 1;
                      B = 0.549 and y = 7.384, showing the  development of  the  lateral  departure from  equilibrium,
                      6 = (deflection)/l versus  MU21/k: ----, theory;  e, experiment  (Lunn  1982). The  inset
                      diagram shows what the development beyond ‘snap’ might be: -,   stable solution; - - -, unstable
                                                        solution.


                      Light caliper-type hinges at the joints ensured planar motions. The pipes were of hfferent
                      diameters, of 0 (lorn), and 0.2-1.0 m long, thus varying both B and y. Typical results
                      for a pipe losing stability by  divergence are shown in Figure 5.14.  ‘Snap’ indicates the
                      point where any further increase in the flow would  ‘cause deflections to grow so large
                      that something would probably break - this was not attempted!’ Hence, it can only be
                      theorized that ‘snap’ corresponds to the point where the system would snap to the larger,
                      stable solution branch,  as  sketched in  the  inset  diagram. If  that  is  so, then  theoretical
                      and experimental paths towards divergence agree remarkably well. Agreement between
                      theory and experiment is less good for pipes theoretically losing stability by a supercritical
                      Hopf bifurcation: in one case the experimental observations indicate that the bifurcation is
                      subcritical (though the critical flow velocities agree very well); and in another, stability is
                      lost by divergence in the experiment. These discrepancies are attributed to imperfections
                      and peculiarities of the rubber joints.
                        An  important recent  study is  due to  Champneys  (1991),  in  which  a  two-degree-of-
                      freedom  system is  considered, modified  as follows:  (i) the  interconnecting springs are
                      nonlinear and (ii) the straight configuration does not correspond to the unstrained-spring
                      case, the two articulations being at an angle @.  Hence, this is a case where, as the flow
                      velocity u is increased, the equilibrium configuration is altered continuously. The bifur-
                      cational behaviour beyond the Hopf bifurcation is tracked, and two kinds of homoclinic
                      orbits are found to exist: so-called E-homoclinic orbits involving tangency to a stationary
                      (equilibrium) point,  and P-homoclinic orbits, bi-asymptotic to periodic  orbits. Because
                      the system is autonomous, AUTO (Doedel & KernCves  1986) could be used to trace all
                      the bifurcations as parameters are varied. The system dynamics is investigated by varying
                      u and  @.  The system loses stability through a Hopf bifurcation for  sufficiently high u.
                      Thereafter, depending on  the  values of  @,  further  increase in  u  could lead  to period-
                      doubling, reverse period-doubling, as well  as homoclinic bifurcations  (both of  E-  and
                      P-type). Among the interesting and unusual dynamical features obtained are isolus in the
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347