Page 403 - Forensic Structural Engineering Handbook
P. 403

11.34             MATERIAL-SPECIFIC FORENSIC ANALYSES

             One of the most serious errors that is made as a result of such modifications, and which
           sometimes occurs even without modification, is to use a structure in a type of service which
           the original designer never intended. Examples of such modifications are reinforcement by
           welding of storage tanks to take higher loads than originally contemplated, increasing live
           loading in a structure without verification of fatigue life, or changing the density or height
           of a fluid in a storage tank without recalculation of resulting stress increases. All these types
           of errors have been documented to result in fractures in structures, some of them disastrous.


           Failure Resulting from Deterioration
           Loss of section and in some cases fatigue cracking and fracture are examples of corrosion-
           induced deterioration that can ultimately damage or destroy structures. Fortunately, since
           deterioration is common, few instances of corrosion have caused loss of life, but the col-
           lapse two decades ago of a major span in the Mianus River Bridge due to corrosion
           processes is one example that did. During the past 35 years, corrosion conditions have also
           developed in a number of other bridge structures that have resulted in loss of service, costly
           repairs, and concern about the safety of these structures. Corrosion by itself may lead to
           failure conditions, but it can also promote, through section loss or pitting and grooving,
           fatigue crack initiation and growth that can cause failures.
             Because most corrosion conditions are time-dependent, this is one failure mode that can
           usually be controlled by inspection and correction as it occurs. However, good inspection
           of structures requires that there be access to critical locations, that these locations be
           known, and that inspections be performed at appropriate intervals. Since corrosion is an
           electrochemical process of a complex nature, it is difficult to describe briefly all the possi-
           ble causes of corrosion in structures. However, the major types of corrosion can be high-
           lighted, and some potentially critical situations are identified in the following paragraph.
             For many structures, the primary corrosion mode is general atmospheric corrosion, and for
           steel products this occurs by rusting. Rust is the product of reactions of iron and steel with oxy-
           gen and moisture, and typically proceeds relatively slowly unless additional chemical contin-
           uants, such as ions from sodium chloride or other salts, are present to accelerate the process.
           The classical solution to this type of corrosion in structures is to create a barrier layer between
           the corroding solution and the steel surface, usually by painting. When the paint layer fails or
           is otherwise removed, corrosion occurs. Since the integrity of this barrier layer can usually be
           assessed by visual inspection, it is a situation that can be monitored and controlled.
             There are some conditions under which corrosion in structures cannot be easily assessed,
           typically where corrosion occurs in crevices and less accessible locations. Areas with crevices,
           under debris and dirt, and in confined spaces can also undergo accelerated and more aggres-
           sive corrosion processes. These locations are often kept moist, and electrochemical cells form
           which change the water chemistry and promote corrosion. For some years, this fact was not
           understood by users of “weathering” (ASTM A588) steels that were used in the unpainted con-
           dition with the expectation that normal atmospheric corrosion processes would lead to the for-
           mation of a protective dark patina which would preclude further significant corrosion. The
           formation of the patina is dependent on wet and dry cycles of service. In the presence of dirt
           and debris, or in confined spaces, the surfaces of these steels do not dry, and thus the effec-
           tiveness of the corrosion protection system is greatly reduced. The same principles also apply
           to painted structures if the paint is allowed to deteriorate. Sometimes corrosion products that
           form in these confined spaces can fill the space and can exert considerable mechanical force,
           separating members, cracking fasteners, and inducing mechanical failures. The latter was the
           case in the Mianus River Bridge failure and LaGuardia Parking Garage bolt failures.
             As indicated earlier, another form of corrosion that occurs in structures is stress corro-
           sion, and it is characterized by cracking phenomena rather than by general or even localized
           section loss. This type of corrosion usually occurs in higher-strength alloy steels, typically
   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407   408