Page 194 - Formation Damage during Improved Oil Recovery Fundamentals and Applications
P. 194

168                                                 Thomas Russell et al.


          industry are the homogeneity of the reservoir and the simplicity of the
          reservoir fluid. The spatial distributions of permeability and porosity are
          already recognized as critical for proper simulation of fluid flow in petro-
          leum reservoirs. The model parameters characterising the susceptibility of
          rocks to damage by fines migration will similarly vary substantially within
          reservoirs. Quantifying the spatial variability of these parameters will most
          likely come from correlations with porosity and permeability. Such corre-
          lations are at the moment unclear and remain a limiting factor for the
          practical application of fines migration modeling on the field scale.
             Fluid compressibility and the validity of Darcy’s law are two other
          assumptions that currently limit the range of application of fines migra-
          tion. Extension of the models to include these effects would allow the
          prediction of fines migration in the presence of complex fluids such as in
          natural gas reservoirs.
             Despite the possibilities for extensions to the presented models, the exist-
          ing literature provides petroleum engineers with sufficient tools to make
          informed decisions in relation to formation damage due to fines migration.





               NOMENCLATURE



          A     Total pore surface area, L 2
          A 132  Hamaker constant
          c     Suspended particle concentration, L 23
          C     Dimensionless suspended particle concentration
          D     Shock front velocity in coordinates (X, T)
          e     Elementary electric charge, IT
                                21 22
          E     Young’s modulus, ML T
          F d   Drag force, MLT 22
          F e   Electrostatic force, MLT 22
          F g   Gravitational force, MLT 22
          F l   Lift force, MLT 22
          f     Fractional flow
          h     Surface-to-surface separation distance, L
          h c   Critical internal cake thickness, L
          II    Injectivity index
          J     Impedance
                Impedance in the damage zone
          J D
                Impedance in undamaged zone
          J UD
                Kinetic detachment coefficient
          k det
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199