Page 542 - Subyek Teknik Mesin - Forsthoffers Best Practice Handbook for Rotating Machinery by William E Forsthoffer
        P. 542
     Dry Gas Seal Best Practices   Be st Practice 9.2
              Summary                                              and could result in seal damage or failure by accumulating debris
                                                                   between the seal rotating and the stationary faces. The design of
              Since there are significant advantages to the use of dry gas seals,  the separation barriers between the lube and seal face must be
              many units are being retrofitted in the field with such systems.  thoroughly examined and audited to ensure reliable and safe
              In many cases, significant payouts can be realized.   operation of this system. Many unscheduled field shutdowns
                If a unit is to be retrofitted, it is strongly recommended that  and safety problems have resulted from the improper design of
              the design of the gas seal be thoroughly audited to ensure safety  the lube system, seal system separation labyrinth. In addition to
              and reliability. As mentioned in this section, retrofitting from  the above considerations, a critical speed analysis, rotor response
              a liquid to a gas seal system renders the unit a separate system  and stability analysis (if the operating discharge pressure is above
              type unit, that is, a separate lube and gas seal system. Naturally,  3,450 kPa [500 psi]) should always be conducted when retro-
              loss of lube oil into the seal system will result in significant costs  fitting from liquid to dry gas seals.
               Best
               Best Practice 9.2Practice 9.2
               Use double seals, with clean gas buffer systems if required,    Primary vent hardware and instrumentation
               if sufficient N 2 pressure is available and it is compatible with    Concerns with flare header pressures that can cause seal pressure
               the process. This results in a less complex system of po-  reversals
               tentially higher reliability than tandem seals.       The intermediate N 2 gas system
                  The reliability of any component is directly related to the complexity  Lack of end user participation in the system specifications has
               of its supporting systems.                          resulted in the use of more complex tandem seal systems where
                  Double dry gas seals require the simplest system design (see  double seal systems could be employed.
               Figure 9.2.1 in Supporting Material section).
                  Double seals can be used for all process services that can tolerate
               N 2 and have a seal reference pressure below 400 kPag (60 psig).  Benchmarks
                  If the process gas can contain debris and/or foul, a source of  FAI has recommended double seals for new projects since 2000.
               clean dry buffer gas is required to prevent seal hang up due to  Double gas seals have been used in low pressure coker and wet gas
               contamination of solid particles in the dynamic seal and spring system.  compressor applications.
               Lessons Learned
               Double dry gas seal systems as compared to tandem sys-
               tems eliminate the following items to reduce complexity and
               optimize reliability:
              B.P. 9.2. Supporting Material
              Double seals can help simplify the seal gas control system, mini-  If the process gas is sour, a sweet buffer gas must be injected
              mize the quantity of seal gas, and optimize system reliability.  between the process labyrinth and DGS to prevent sour gas
              Double seals are normally applied where an inert seal gas (usually  contact and potential DGS fouling. Differential pressure control
              N 2 ), which is compatible with theprocess, is available ata pressure  is typically used. Flow control is also an acceptable option,
              exceeding the maximum process pressure at the seal interface (to  provided the flow is sufficient to maintain a velocity of 15 m/sec
              prevent a seal pressure reversal). If N 2 from a regulated system is  (50 ft/sec) through the process labyrinth at twice the maximum
              used, the seal gas control valve can be eliminated (Figure 9.2.1).  design clearance.
                                                                                                               513





