Page 219 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 219

1656_C004.fm  Page 199  Thursday, April 21, 2005  5:38 PM





                       Dynamic and Time-Dependent Fracture                                         199


                       By performing a Laplace transform on Equation (4.59) and Equation (4.60), it can be shown that
                       the creep compliance and the relaxation modulus are related as follows:

                                                ∫ t  Et −τ ) dD( −ττ o ) d  τ  H =  ( −  t  τ  o )  (4.61)
                                                   (
                                                τ ο         dτ

                          For deformation in three dimensions, the generalized hereditary integral for strain is given by


                                                                    kl
                                                  ε  ij  ∫ t D () =  ijkl    t  −  τ t  d στ ()     τ d  (4.62)
                                                        0           τ d  
                       but symmetry considerations reduce the number of independent creep compliance constants. In
                       the case of a linear viscoelastic isotropic material, there are two independent constants, and the
                       mechanical behavior can be described by E(t) or D(t), which are uniquely related, plus ν (t), the
                                                                                                c
                       Poisson’s ratio for creep.
                          Following an approach developed by Schapery [59], it is possible to define a pseudo-elastic
                       strain, which for uniaxial conditions is given by
                                                                 (
                                                           e
                                                          ε t() =  σ t)                          (4.63)
                                                                E R
                       where E  is a reference modulus. Substituting Equation (4.63) into Equation (4.59) gives
                             R
                                                                    e
                                                  ε    E =  R ∫ t D  ( −  t  τ() t  ) d ετ()  τ d  (4.64)
                                                           0         τ d

                       The pseudo-strains in three dimensions are related to the stress tensor through Hooke’s law,
                       assuming isotropic material behavior:

                                                   ε  ij e  −1  ν =  σ E [(  i  j  −  ν 1  σ +  kk ij ]  (4.65)
                                                                       δ )
                                                        R
                       where δ  is the Kronecker delta, and the standard convention of summation on repeated indices is
                             ij
                       followed. If ν  = ν = constant with time, it can be shown that the three-dimensional generalization
                                  c
                       of Equation (4.64) is given by
                                                                     e
                                                                     ij
                                                  ε  ij  E () =  R ∫ t D  ( −  t  τ t  ) d ετ()  τ d  (4.66)
                                                           0         τ d
                       and the inverse of Equation (4.66) is as follows:


                                                                     ij
                                                  ε  ij e  E () =  R −1 ∫ t E  ( −  t  τ t  ) d ετ()  τ d  (4.67)
                                                           0          τ d
                          The advantage of introducing pseudo-strains is that they can be related to stresses through
                       Hooke’s law. Thus, if a linear elastic solution is known for a particular geometry, it is possible to
                       determine the corresponding linear viscoelastic solution through a hereditary integral. Given two
                       identical configurations, one made from a linear elastic material and the other made from a linear
                       viscoelastic material, the stresses in both bodies must be identical, and the strains are related through
   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224