Page 313 - T. Anderson-Fracture Mechanics - Fundamentals and Applns.-CRC (2005)
P. 313

1656_C006.fm  Page 293  Monday, May 23, 2005  5:50 PM





                       Fracture Mechanisms in Nonmetals                                            293
























                                                             (a)














                                                             (b)

                       FIGURE 6.41 The “fictitious crack” model for concrete: (a) schematic stress-displacement response and (b)
                       damage zone ahead of a growing crack. Taken from Hillerborg, A., Modeer, M., and Petersson, P.E., “Analysis
                       of Crack Formation and Crack Growth in Concrete by Means of Fracture Mechanics and Finite Elements.”
                       Cement and Concrete Research, Vol. 6, 1976, pp. 773–782. Hillerborg, A., “Application of the Fictitious Crack
                       Model to Different Materials.” International Journal of Fracture, Vol. 51, 1991, pp. 95–102.

                       of concrete are often quite large, and the interaction between the process zone and free boundaries
                       can influence the behavior. Consequently, G  is not a material property in general, but can depend
                                                          c
                       on specimen size. Fracture toughness results from small-scale tests tend to be lower than values
                       obtained from larger samples.
                          The phenomena of size effects in concrete fracture has been the subject of considerable study
                       [50, 53–56]. Some of the apparent size effects can be attributed to inappropriate data reduction
                       methods. For example, if fracture toughness is computed by substituting the load at fracture into
                       a linear elastic K or G relationship, the resulting value will be size dependent, because the nonlin-
                       earity due to the process zone has been neglected. Such an approach is analogous to applying linear
                       elastic  K equations to metal specimens that exhibit significant plasticity prior to failure. Even
                       approaches that account for the process zone exhibit size dependence, however [54]. A fracture
                       parameter that uniquely characterizes these materials would be of great benefit.

                       REFERENCES


                          1. Johnson, W.S. (ed.), Metal Matrix Composites:  Testing, Analysis, and Failure Modes. ASTM STP
                             1032, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1989.
                          2. Williams, J.G., Fracture Mechanics of Polymers. Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, UK., 1984.
   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318