Page 85 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 85

73
             Enhanced Oil Recovery Using CO 2

                   where a and b are the constants of PR equation, x represents the mole fraction of
                   each component in the mixture, δ is the binary interaction parameter, a i,j and b i are
                   also constants that are functions of critical pressure and temperature, and acentric
                   factor.
                      Using PR EOS, Mulliken and Sadler [38] showed that it is possible to treat the oil
                   as a single pseudo-component. Finally, they were able to characterize the system of
                   CO 2  oil only when specific gravity, mean boiling point, or UOP factor is known.
                   They used the same experimental data of Simon and Graue [37] for accuracy evalua-
                   tion. Their model showed an average error of only 1.9% in the predicted CO 2 mole
                   fraction in the oil; thus it shows better performance as compared with the
                   Simon Graue [37] correlation, which gives an average error of 2.3%.

                   3.2.2.1.3 Mehrotra and Svrcek [39]
                   They proposed a new correlation for prediction of CO 2 solubility, mainly in bitumen.
                   However, their correlation has been applied for crude oil samples. They found a linear
                   relationship between pressure and CO 2 solubility up to a pressure of about 6 MPa.
                   Beyond this region predicted values deviate much from experimental data. This is
                   indeed a limitation to the use of their correlation. Temperature range was also set to


                   be from 23.89 C to 97.22 C. An average deviation of 6.3% is reported for their cor-
                   relation. The correlation is as follows:
                                                                                     2
                                                                          P      P
                                        3         3
                            Solubility ðcm CO 2 =cm mixtureÞ5b 1 1 b 2 P 1 b 4  1 b 4     (3.4)
                                                                         T       T
                   with
                            b 1 52 0:0073508; b 2 52 14:794; b 3 5 6428:5; and b 4 5 4971:39

                   where T is in K and P is in MPa.

                   3.2.2.1.4 Chung et al. [40]
                   Chung et al. [40] defined the solubility of CO 2 in a crude oil, R s , as the volume (in
                   scf) of CO 2 in the CO 2 -saturated oil per barrel of dead-state oil at the temperature at
                   which solubility is measured. They stated that CO 2 solubility mostly depends on tem-
                   perature and pressure and only slightly on specific gravity. Referring to the proposed
                   solubility diagram as a function of pressure by Chung et al. [40], they postulated the
                   following discussions about CO 2 solubility.
                      “As demonstrated in the solubility diagram developed by Chung et al. [40], sol-
                   ubility of CO 2 in heavy oil increases with pressure but decreases with temperature at pres-
                   sures below 3000 psia. The line of the 75 F(24 C) isotherm shows that solubility of


                   liquid CO 2 (at pressures greater than 1000 psia (6.9 MPa)) in oil is not strongly sensitive
                   to pressure. The solubilities of gases in liquids are normally decreased with the increase of
   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90