Page 90 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 90

78                                                                      Ramin Moghadasi et al.


                3.2.2.2.2 Simon and Graue [37]
                In 1965, Simon and Graue [37] postulated that the swelling factor is not only a
                function of the amount of dissolved CO 2 , but also of the size of the oil molecules
                (M/ρ cc/g mol). They presented a graphical tool for predicting the swelling factor,
                which is based on the relationship between swelling factor, mole fraction of CO 2 dis-
                solved, and molecular size. Obviously, the swelling effect for heavy oil is not as drastic
                as for light oil.
                   Simon and Graue [37] have reported an average deviation of 0.5% from experi-
                mental data.

                3.2.2.2.3 Mulliken and Sadler [38]
                Mulliken and Sadler have tried to find a theoretical correlation for swelling factor pre-
                diction. They applied the PR [44] EOS once to the CO 2 -saturated crude oil at satu-
                ration conditions, and then again to the crude oil at 1 atm and the same temperature.
                The swelling factor was defined as the ratio of the volume of the oil CO 2 mixture at
                saturation pressure and temperature to the oil volume at the saturation temperature
                and atmospheric pressure.


                3.2.2.2.4 Emera and Sarma [41]
                Based on Emera and Sarma [41] correlation, oil swelling factor can be predicted as
                follows:
                a. For oils with MW $ 300:
                                                    3
                                                              4
                                          2
                                                                        5
                  SF 5 1 1 0:3302y 2 0:8417y 1 1:5804y 2 1:074y 1 0:0318y 2 0:21755y 6  (3.13)
                b. For oils with MW , 300:
                                                       3
                                            2
                                                                 4
                                                                            5
                   SF 5 1 1 0:48411y 2 0:9928y 1 1:6019y 2 1:2773y 1 0:48267y 2 0:06671y 6
                                                                                      (3.14)
                                                γ
                                     γ     2 expðÞ

                where y 5 1000        3 Sol    MW  . γ is the oil-specific gravity (oil density at
                                 MW
                15.6 C), SF is the oil swelling factor, Sol is the CO 2 solubility in oil in mole fraction,

                and MW is the oil molecular weight in g/mol.
                   The experimental data ranges used for developing and testing of the model for
                dead and live oil are given in the work of Emera and Sarma [41]. Emera and Sarma
                [41] also examined their model over that of Simon and Graue [37].
                3.2.2.2.5 Viscosity Reduction
                By definition, viscosity is the resistance of a fluid to flow on a solid surface. Therefore
                any flow equation accounts fluid viscosity for calculations. In a reservoir being flooded
                immiscibly with gas, there is system of two-phase fluid flow. It is therefore very
                important to accurately predict and model flow behavior of each fluid. Viscosity is a
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95