Page 92 - Fundamentals of Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery
P. 92

80                                                                      Ramin Moghadasi et al.


                   As it can be seen, the mobility ratio increases through A to F, and as a result, flow
                instability occurs. At high mobility ratios, gas will break through via narrow fingers at
                very low pore volume injected. This results in a low sweep efficiency, which means
                that low oil recovery would be achieved. Favorably, a stable displacement would occur
                as long as M ,1, and an unstable fingering displacement would occur for M .1. The
                other plot for representing such instability is shown in Fig. 3.10 [12,48].
                   Based on the abovementioned discussions, a modification to M toward smaller
                values would stabilize the flow condition. When CO 2 is injected into the reservoir, it
                dissolves in oil and reduces the oil viscosity. Therefore mobility ratio is modified to a
                smaller value. However, CO 2 mobility is still high compared with that of the oil, and
                fingering potential could be very high, especially when permeability variations in a
                stratum are considerable.
                   Indeed, viscosity reduction is an effective mechanism accounting for increasing oil
                recovery during immiscible CO 2 injection; nonetheless, the degree of effectiveness is
                highly dependent on oil properties and rock characteristics. Viscosity effects are totally
                more profound on heavy oils than light ones. At low viscosity values, this is water
                flood, which is technically superior to immiscible CO 2 flood. This is due to the more
                favorable mobility control through the water flooding process. However, CO 2 immis-
                cible flooding recovers significantly more oil than inert gas drive at low viscosities.
                This observation could be attributed to the better mobility ratio due to viscosity
                reduction and greater swelling of the oil, thus leaving less residual oil in place. At
                higher viscosities (i.e., 70 1000 mPa   s), CO 2 injection appears to be superior than
                the other methods. This is because of higher viscosity reduction and swelling associ-
                ated with CO 2 injection. Typically, natural gas-saturated oils have viscosities in the
                range of 0.7 to 700 mPa   s, and carbonated oils have viscosities between 0.3 and
                30 mPa.s. This serves less mobility ratio during CO 2 injection, which is more

                                             Producer                            Producer

                            Displaced fluid                     Displaced fluid






                      Displacing     Fingering
                        fluid                              Displacing
                                                             fluid
                                          M > 1                               M < 1
                   Injector                             Injector
                Figure 3.10 Effect of mobility ratio on flow stability for both values less than and more than
                unity [49].
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97