Page 183 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 183

dIScuSSIOn   163
                                    Well#1                                         Well#1
                                     K/TH                                           K/PE
                               Interval : 2290 : 2670   TVD                   Interval : 2290 : 2670   TVD
                  25                Possible 100% Kaolinite  2670  10                                    2670
                      Heavy thorium- bearing minerals  Th/K:25  Th/K:12  Montmorillonite, Illite”
                                              100% Illite point
                  20       Kaolinite  “clay line”         2560    8                                      2594

                                                   Th/K:3.5         Chlorite     Glauconite
                  15                                              6                            Biotite   2518
                 TH ppm  10       Mixed layer clay  70% Illite Th/K:2  2470  PE  4                       2442


                         Montmorillonite  Illite  40% mica  2370                 Illite        Muscovite

                                                                    Montmorillonite
                   5                   Mica   30% glauconite      2  Kaolinite                           2366
                                                  Th/K:0.6
                     Chlorite      Glauconite  Feldspar Th/K:0.3
                   0                   Potassium evap 30% feldspar  2290  0                              2290
                    0      1      2      3      4      5           0      2      4      6      8      10
                                 K Potassium (%)                                     K
                      FIGURE 7.26  natural gamma ray spectrometry (nGS) logs from Well #1 for Kockatea Shale (Perth Basin).




            Shale are discussed in Section 7.5.4. An additional point for   Western Australia. Well log and mud log data were the base
            discussion is a verification of the estimated pore pressure in   of this study. Pore pressure was inferred indirectly using
            the absence of measured pore pressure such as RdT, mdT,   Eaton’s equation  from sonic logs utilizing the Interactive
            and dST tests, which is discussed in Section 7.5.5.  Petrophysics software. Overpressure was observed through
                                                                 the diversion of the porosity‐dependent parameters from
                                                                 their normal trends.  These data parameters include sonic
            7.5.1  Significance of Pore Pressure Study
                                                                 transit time, resistivity, porosity, and density. Sonic transit
            Pore pressure evaluation in sedimentary rocks is not only   time was preferred for pore pressure estimation of shales
            significant for safe drilling operation and appropriate com-  mainly due to it being less affected by bad borehole condi-
            pletion planning, but it is also important for formation eval-  tions than any other logs such as resistivity and density logs.
            uation analysis for the gas shale intervals. If pore pressure
            evaluation study is coupled with a study of other shale   7.5.3  Pore Pressure and Compressional Tectonics
            parameters such as the total organic contents (TOcs) and
            the  thermal  maturity  of  shales,  this  may  be  used  for  the   Investigations into the well log data from the Perth Basin
            identification of shale gas sweet spots. For an efficient   have characterized the lower section of Kockatea Shale in
            formation evaluation process, it is important to know the   some parts of the Perth Basin as being overpressured. On the
            pore pressure regime, which can be normal, subnormal, or   other hand, similar sections in similar formations have been
            abnormal  high  pressure  (overpressure).  The  overpressure   found to be normally pressured in other parts of the basin. It
            phenomenon  is  frequently  detected  in  low  permeability   is believed that the severe uplifting and the subsequent
            zones such as shale formations as shale tends to retain over-  erosion caused by compressional tectonics had a great
            pressure more when compared to other types of rocks.   impact on the pore pressure distribution in the Kockatea
            Furthermore, overpressure could be attributed to an indicator   Shale. normal pore pressure regimes were observed in the
            of commercial gas accumulation and therefore, give greater   Kockatea Shale in areas that were rigorously uplifted and
            significance to the formation that is being evaluated.  eroded. uplifting and subsequent erosion due to tectonics
                                                                 compression removed significant portions of the Kockatea
                                                                 Shale in some regions and induced fractures within the
            7.5.2  Overpressure Detection and Estimation
                                                                 Kockatea Shale in some other areas. This took place in local-
            In total, data from 35 boreholes in the Perth Basin were eval-  ities that are in the immediate vicinity of the centers of the
            uated.  The normal compaction trend method (ncT) was   two major uplifting and extension phases. The first phase of
            implemented to predict pore pressure in the Perth Basin in   extension is an Early Permian phase created half‐grabens
   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188