Page 184 - Fundamentals of Gas Shale Reservoirs
P. 184

164   PORE PRESSuRE PREdIcTIOn FOR ShAlE FORmATIOnS uSInG WEll lOG dATA

            that hinge around the northampton high. The second and   Kockatea Shale. The present‐day pressure of the upper sec-
            more extensive phase of oblique extension occurred in the   tion of Kockatea Shales exhibits normal pressure gradients.
            late Jurassic to Early cretaceous periods. The center of the   Overpressure in this section may have been developed and
            second uplifting phase is near the coastal town of Jurien in   then released due to high permeability of the overlaying
            Beagle Ridge, where up to 8 km of sections were removed.   Woodada sandstone sections, which have not allowed over-
            normal pore pressures were observed mainly in wells where   pressures to be preserved within the shales (Fig. 7.16, left).
            Kockatea Shale was intersected at a shallower depth in the   Additionally, this stratigraphical sequence suggests that
            localities of Beagle Ridge and cadda Terrace. Overpressure   overpressure has been generated internally (clay transforma-
            in these areas may have developed and been due to the   tion). The system may have been pressurized and then re‐
            fractures  which  acted  as conduits,  overpressures  were   equilibrated back to the normal conditions (Ahmad et al.,
            released through.  The removal of significant parts of the   2014). Incomplete clay transformations could be a possible
            formation may have facilitated a re‐equilibration of the pore   explanation for having a normal pore pressure in the upper
            pressure back to the normal condition.               section of Kockatea Shale.
              On the other hand, overpressures were observed in the   In fact, clay transformation from smectite to illite is not to
            Kockatea mainly in regions where there was less intense tec-  be considered a significant mechanism that produces a high
            tonic activity, particularly in wells where Kockatea Shale   magnitude of overpressure (Osborne and Swarbrick, 1997).
            was intersected at deeper depth. Regions with less intensity   This is due to the fact that the maximum volume changes
            in tectonic activity showed a progressive increase in pressure   between interlayer and intergranular water only increase the
            gradients away from the center of uplift (Fig.  7.23).  The   volume of intergranular water by an insignificant amount.
            areas where overpressures were observed include      Since  the  overpressure  observed  in  the  Kockatea  Shale  is
            dandaragan Trough and adjacent terraces that have similar   noticeably in high magnitude as noticed from the reversals
            structures.  The phenomenon of overpressure has been   of the vertical effective stress, the clay transformation mech-
            observed by the diversion of the effective stress‐dependent   anism could be combining with other overpressure‐gener-
            parameters from their normal trends. The top of the over-  ating mechanisms.
            pressure zones are the depths where the diversion occurred   The most likely mechanism to be associated with the clay
            and  overpressures  were  confirmed  by  cross‐checking  the   transformation is the lateral tectonics compression. The main
            available data such as drilling reports, mud log data.  reasons for this deduction are (i) the forces induced by the
                                                                 principal stress (S hmax ) which act in a horizontal plane EW per-
                                                                 pendicular to the main north–south and northwest–southeast
            7.5.4  Overpressure-Generating Mechanisms
                                                                 faults trends (Fig. 7.15) and (ii) the positions and the trends of
            It is noted that there were combination mechanisms that con-  the main faults and the main transfer faults providing efficient
            tributed to overpressure development, driven by the compli-  lateral seals for the overpressure developed in the Kockatea
            cated basin  geology. Fluid expansion and later  tectonic   Shale. The lateral tectonics explains the high magnitude of
            loading have contributed to different extents to overpressure   overpressure observed as the diagenesis effects cannot pro-
            development.                                         duce high overpressure. lateral tectonics compression would
              Among fluid expansion mechanisms, clay diagenesis is   have caused the vertical effective stress to be reversed and
            the mechanism most likely to have contributed to overpres-  density log to change slightly or remain at a reasonably
            sure development in the lower section of the Kockatea Shale.   constant value because compaction is not reversible.
            This  deduction  was reached  from the  results  that  were   Additionally, lateral tectonics causes an increase in neutron
            obtained from the analysis of wireline log responses, sonic‐  porosity (Fig. 7.24). more investigations are needed to ascer-
            density  cross‐plots,  XRd,  and  nGS  logs.  The shale  in   tain whether clay transformation or lateral compression was
            Figure 7.25 is of a depth and temperature where it is likely   the primary mechanism for generating overpressure.
            for the smectite to be mostly transformed to illite. This figure
            shows  points  with  a  higher  difference  between  neutron   7.5.5  Overpressure Results Verifications
            porosity and density porosity falling farther from the smec-
            tite‐rich trend. It has been noticed that as depth increases, the   mud logging data including mud weight, drilling ROP,
            difference between neutron porosity and density porosity   kicks, and so on were used to validate the results and replace
            increases while the ratio of smectite to illite decreases, and   the absence of direct pressure measurement (e.g., RFT,
            therefore,  the  pore  pressure  gradients  increase  (unloading   dST). In locations where there were diversions of the
            increases). It should be noted that while there are a few data   porosity‐dependent parameters  from their normal trends,
            points where the difference of neutron porosity–density   mud logging data in these sections showed every indication
            porosity approaches the smectite rich trend (the ratio of   of Kockatea Shale being overpressured. Overpressure‐
            smectite to illite increases), these data points are not consid-  related parameters obtained from mud logging data include
            ered as being representative of the whole shale interval other   a continuous increase in each of the ROP, the mud weight,
            than  in  the  inter‐bedded  sandstone  sections  within  the   and the gas shows within these intervals. It is noted there
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189