Page 420 - Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design
P. 420

398     Fundamentals of Magnetic Thermonuclear Reactor Design


            13.5.3.1  Single-Stage Annealing
            One batch of specimens was irradiated in the SM-2 reactor at 160°C up to 0.2–
            0.6 dpa [12]. The specimens were then subjected to a 10-h annealing at 350°C
            and 400°C. The other batch was irradiated in the same reactor at 150°C up to
            2.5 dpa and annealed for 10 h in vacuum at 300°C and 350°C. Reference speci-
            mens, irradiated specimens and irradiated-and-annealed specimens were tensile
            tested.
               The obtained experimental results suggest that annealing is an effective pro-
            cess, allowing irradiated specimens to recover their plasticity properties almost
            completely.
               This conclusion is valid for the whole range of doses up to ∼2 dpa. For the
            Cu–Cr–Zr IG alloy, the effect of annealing is not great, due probably to the high
            mobility of the Cr atoms, stabilising the clusters of radiation-induced defects.
               The annealing effect on the thermal and electrical conductivity, determined
            by the concentration of transmutation products, was insignificant, as transmuta-
            tion processes are beyond the annealing control.

            13.5.3.2  Irradiation–Annealing–Irradiation Cycle
            It has been proved experimentally that irradiation–annealing–irradiation cycles
            do not lead to any additive embrittlement of either pure copper or the GlidCopAl
            25 IG alloy. The effects of a radiation-induced hardening and embrittlement of
            an alloy due to a 0.0014 dpa irradiation followed by a 24-h annealing at 350°C
            then followed by a 0.013 dpa irradiation are comparable to the effect of an
            one-off up to 0.0154 dpa irradiation of the same alloy. It seems that a recovery
            annealing of a copper alloy helps develop a microstructure that is relatively
            resilient to further irradiation [13]. Then, perhaps, a periodic annealing should
            be regarded as an effective way to improve the durability of copper heat-con-
            ductive structures and in-chamber components of a fusion reactor.

            13.6  MATERIALS FOR THE VACUUM CHAMBER AND SUPPORTS

            The prime constructional material for the ITER vacuum chamber, divertor
            and blanket is the 316L(N) IG–grade austenitic stainless steel. It differs from
            the basic 316L(N) grade, historically employed in nuclear power engineer-
            ing, in that it has a lower content of impurities, such as cobalt, niobium and
            tantalum (because of the induced radioactivity minimisation requirement).
            The steel is characterised by high plasticity and fracture toughness, resis-
            tivity to cyclic fatigue, and the ferritic phase low content. In addition, it is
            highly fabricable and retains its mechanical properties if subjected to weld-
            ing or soldering [14].
               In ITER operational conditions (an irradiation dose of up to 20 dpa), the
            316L(N) IG steel shows an attractive combination of radiation characteristics.
            Its plasticity does not fall below 10% up to a dose of ∼10 dpa [15]. No critical
            swelling or helium embrittlement occurs even with an intense transmutation
   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425