Page 311 - Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers
P. 311

294                    Fundamentals of Probability and Statistics for Engineers

           where I 1 is the modified first-order Bessel function of the first kind, and

                                           x j   ^ 1=2
                                       y j ˆ    :                      …9:121†
                                               b 2

             As we can see, although likelihood equations can be established, they are
                                      b 2
           complicated functions of   ^ and   ,  and we must resort to numerical means for
           their solutions. As we have pointed out earlier, this difficulty is often encoun-
           tered when using the method of maximum likelihood. Indeed, Example 9.13
           shows that the method of moments offers considerable computational advan-
           tage in this case.
             The variances of the maximum likelihood estimators for    and   2  can be
           obtained, in principle, from Equations (9.119) and (9.120). We can also show
           that their variances can be larger than those associated with the moment
           estimators obtained in Example 9.13 for moderate sample sizes (see Benedict
           and Soong, 1967). This observation serves to remind us again that, although
           maximum likelihood estimators possess optimal asymptotic properties, they
           may perform poorly when the sample size is small.



           9.3.2  INTERVAL  ESTIMATION

           We now examine another approach to the problem of parameter estimation. As
           stated in the introductory text of Section 9.3, the interval estimation provides,
           on the basis of a sample from a population, not only information on the
           parameter values to be estimated, but also an indication of the level of con-
           fidence that can be placed on possible numerical values of the parameters.
           Before developing the theory of interval estimation, an example will be used
           to demonstrate that a method that appears to be almost intuitively obvious
           could lead to conceptual difficulties.
             Suppose that five sample values –3, 2, 1.5, 0.5, and 2.1 – are observed from a
                                                                         2
           normal distribution having an unknown mean m and a known variance   ˆ 9.
           From Example 9.15, we see that the MLE of m is the sample mean X  and thus
                                1
                            ^ m ˆ …3 ‡ 2 ‡ 1:5 ‡ 0:5 ‡ 2:1†ˆ 1:82:     …9:122†
                                5
           Our additional task is to determine the upper and lower limits of an interval
           such that, with a specified level of confidence, the true mean m will lie in this
           interval.
             The  maximum  likelihood  estimator  for  m  is X ,  which,  being  a  sum  of
                                                                     2
           normal random  variables,  is normal with  mean  m and  variance   /n ˆ 9/5.







                                                                            TLFeBOOK
   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316