Page 491 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 491

(6.112)

               The function sign(x)  is  +1  if x  >  0  and  –1  if x < 0. Note that several of the
               equations simplify in the nonfluctuating case, K = ∞. Specifically, in this case C            1
               = C  = 0 so that in turn C  = 0 and C = 1.
                   2
                                            dB
                     The  accuracy  bounds  on  Shnidman’s  equation  are  somewhat  looser  than
               those specified for Albersheim’s equation. Except at the extreme values of P                  D

               for the Swerling 1 case, the error in the estimate of χ  is less than 0.5 dB for 0.1
                                                                              1
                                  –9
                                                 –3
               ≤ P  ≤ 0.99, 10  ≤ P  ≤ 10 , and 1 ≤ N ≤ 100. This is a much wider range for
                   D
                                        FA
               P  than used in Albersheim’s equation. The range of N is much smaller but still
                 D
               large enough for almost all problems of interest. Figure 6.15 illustrates the error
               in  the  estimate  of  the  single-pulse  SNR χ   using  Shnidman’s  equation  for  the
                                                                  1
                               –6
               case P  = 10 , N = 5, and P  over the specified range of 0.1 to 0.99.
                                                 D
                       FA






































               FIGURE 6.15   Example of error in estimating χ  via Shnidman’s equation for P                FA
                                                                      1
                    –6
               = 10  and N = 5.


                     A still more accurate approximation for the nonfluctuating and Swerling 1

               cases is described in Hmam (2003). However, it is not applicable to all of the
               Swerling cases and the computations, while easy, are more extensive.
   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496