Page 490 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 490

The  analytic  results  in Table 6.1 are too complex for “back-of-the-envelope”

               calculations or even for calculation on programmable calculators. Albersheim’s
               equation provided a simple approximation for the nonfluctuating target case, but
               it is not applicable to fluctuating targets in general or the Swerling models in
               particular.  This  is  a  serious  limitation  since  the  nonfluctuating  case  provides
               overly optimistic results for most parameter ranges of interest.
                     Fortunately,  empirical  approximations  have  also  been  developed  for  the

               Swerling  cases.  One  example  is Shnidman’s  equation  (Shnidman,  2002).
               Similar to Albersheim’s equation, this series of equations gives the single-pulse
               SNR χ  required to achieve a specified P  and P  with noncoherent integration
                                                                D
                       1
                                                                         FA
               of N samples. Unlike Albersheim’s equation, the results are for a square law
               detector. However, as noted previously the differences in the required SNR for
               linear and square-law detectors are typically no more than 0.2 dB.
                     Shnidman’s equation is given by the following series of calculations:





















                                                                                                     (6.109)




















                                                                                                     (6.110)











                                                                                                     (6.111)
   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495