Page 509 - Fundamentals of Radar Signal Processing
P. 509

6.5.4   CA CFAR Limitations
               The cell-averaging CFAR concept relies on two major assumptions:


                     1.  Targets are isolated; specifically, targets are separated by at least the
                        reference window size, so that no two are ever in the reference window

                        at the same time.
                     2.  All of the reference window interference samples are independent and
                        identically distributed, and that distribution is the same as that of the
                        interference component in the cell containing the target; in other words,
                        the interference is homogeneous.



               While useful in many situations, either or both of these conditions are frequently
               violated in real-world scenarios. The second assumption is particularly likely
               to be untrue when the dominant interference is clutter, i.e., echo from terrain,
               rather than thermal noise. In this section the effect on cell-averaging CFAR of
               violating  these  assumptions  is  discussed,  and  then  some  modifications  that
               combat these effects are described.

                     Target masking  occurs  when  two  or  more  targets  are  present  such  that,
               when one target is in the test cell, one or more targets are located among the
               reference  cells.  Assuming  that  the  power  of  the  target  in  the  reference  cell
               exceeds that of the surrounding interference, its presence will raise the estimate
               of the interference power and thus of the CFAR threshold. The target(s) in the
               reference window can “mask” the target in the test cell because the increased
               threshold  will  cause  a  reduction  in  the  probability  of  detection,  i.e.,  the

               detection  is  more  likely  to  be  missed.  Equivalently,  a  higher  SNR  will  be
               required to achieve a specified  .
                     Figure 6.22 is an example of target masking. As before, the interference
               level is 20 dB, the target in range bin 50 has an SNR of 15 dB, and the threshold

                                                                                            –3
               is  computed  using  20  reference  cells  and  a  desired    of  10 .  However,  a
               second  target  with  an  SNR  of  20  dB  in  range  bin  58  elevates  the  estimated
               interference  power  when  the  first  target  is  in  the  test  cell.  This  increase  in
               threshold is sufficient to prevent detection of the first target in this case. On the
               other  hand,  the  15  dB  target  does  not  affect  the  threshold  enough  to  prevent
               detection of the second, stronger target.
   504   505   506   507   508   509   510   511   512   513   514