Page 350 - Fundamentals of Reservoir Engineering
P. 350

REAL GAS FLOW: GAS WELL TESTING                              285


               2)    Flow Analysis

                     Plots of m(p wf) versus log t for the data listed in table 8.10, are shown as fig. 8.15 (b)
                     and (c), from which the data presented in table 8.13 have been determined.

                         Rate            Slope            m(p wf) 1-hr       k        Total Skin
                                       2
                        Mscf/d     psia /cp/log cycle                       mD
                      40×10 3         16.64×10 6          828.38×10 6       45            9.9
                      60 "            26.08 "             645.16   "        43           11.9

                                                          TABLE 8.13

                     The values of the permeability in this table have been calculated using equ. (8.54) for
                     rates Q 1 and Q 2 and the total skin factors using equs. (8.57) and (8.60) for the first and
                     second flow periods respectively. In applying equ. (8.60) the value of  ( ) 1hr  has
                                                                                         mp′
                                                                                             ws
                                                                                                −
                                                                                               2
                                                                                          6
                     been determined from the buildup plot for ∆t = 9 hours as 1064.65 × 10  psia /cp
                     (fig. 8.15 (a) and table 8.12). The reader can verify that irrespective of whether
                       ( )
                                mp
                     mp′         (    ) for the maximum buildup time, or m(p i) is used in equ. (8.60) makes
                         ws
                            1hr,    ws
                            −
                     very little difference to the calculated value of S′ . Finally, S and D can be calculated by
                                                                   2
                     solving the equations
                               S′ 1   =    9.9   =     S  +  40  × 10 3  D
                               S′ 2   =    11.9 =      S + 60 × 10 3   D
                                                             -4
                     to give    S     =    5.9; D = 1.0 × 10 /Mscf/d
                                            1422 DT
                                                                  2
                     and        F     =               = 0.043 psia /cp/(Mscf/d) 2
                                               kh
                     and from these figures the Darcy flow coefficient B can be calculated for the estimated
                     values of A and C A, equ. (8.44), for use in long term well deliverability calculations.

                     A similar example of a pressure buildup analysis, for a low permeability reservoir
                                                                                              3
                     (k = 5 mD),has been presented in the literature by Al-Hussainy and Ramey . The main
                     advantage of this type of test over the multi-rate drawdown test is the same as
                     mentioned in Chapter 7, sec. 7. It is, that the buildup analysis will provide values of
                     k and S′ which are independent of the value of m(t D ) at the time of the survey.
                            1
                     Furthermore, since only the transient pressure response during each flow period is
                     interpreted, then it means that the entire test can be analysed without having to be
                     concerned about the size or shape of the area drained or the well position with respect
                     to the boundary.

                     The pressure buildup test can also be used for the routine surveys conducted at
                     regular intervals throughout the producing life of the field. Prior to the survey the well
                     must be produced at a constant rate for a sufficient period of time so that the flow is
                     under semi-steady state conditions. This renders transient analysis of the first flow
                     period, at rate Q 1, impossible but analysis of the buildup will yield values of k and S′.
                                                                                                      1
                     Following this, k and S′  can be determined from the transient analysis of the second
                                           2
   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355