Page 231 - Fundamentals of The Finite Element Method for Heat and Fluid Flow
P. 231

223
                        CONVECTION HEAT TRANSFER
                        axis in the direction of the flow. Therefore, the temperature values close to the surface of
                        the sphere are near to unity, which reduce in value away from the sphere and finally reach
                        zero value in the free air stream. In the downstream direction, however, the temperatures are
                        greater than that of the free stream temperature all the way to the exit (see Figure 7.25). This
                        indicates that the cold air stream removes heat from the sphere, which is then transported
                        to the exit.
                           The values of drag coefficient and average Nusselt numbers are given in Tables 7.1
                        and 7.2 respectively. In Table 7.1, the quantity inside the brackets is the pressure drag
                        coefficient.


                        7.11.2 Buoyancy-driven convection heat transfer

                        Buoyancy-driven convection is created by the occurrence of local temperature differences
                        in a fluid. This type of convection can also be created by local concentration differences













                          Figure 7.25 Forced convection flow past a sphere. Temperature contours, Re = 100


                                Table 7.1 Comparison of coefficient of drag with existing literature
                            Author Re                                  100          200

                            Clift et al. (Clift et al. 1978)       1.087             —
                            S. Lee (Lee 2000)                      1.096 (0.512)     —
                                ¸
                            G¨ ulcat and Aslan (G¨ ulc¸at ¨ and Aslan 1997)  1.07  0.78
                            Rimon and Cheng (Rimon and Cheng 1969)  1.014       0.727
                            Le Clair et al.(La Clair et al. 1970)  1.096 (0.590)  0.772 (0.372)
                            Magnaudet et al. (Magnaudet et al. 1995)  1.092 (0.584)  0.765 (0.368)
                            CBS                                    1.105 (0.564)  0.7708 (0.347)


                                        Table 7.2 Comparison of average Nusselt number

                                 Re   (Yuge 1960)  (Whitaker 1983)  (Feng et al. 2000)  CBS
                                 50     5.4860        5.1764           5.4194      5.2176
                                100     6.9300        6.6151           6.9848      6.6589
                                200     8.9721        8.7219           9.1901      8.7599
   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236