Page 339 - Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes : Physical, Chemical, and Biological
P. 339

294                            Fundamentals of Water Treatment Unit Processes: Physical, Chemical, and Biological



                                                  To filters


                                                                                     +





                                58.8 m  Inlet channel  Grit basin  Sed. basin #3: 13,251 m 3    Sed. basin #2: 6,436 m 3    Sed. basin #1: 3,218 m 3    + Four flocculation tanks, each 13.4 m  dia. 7.0 m  depth

                                                                                     +



                                                                                     +


                               Raw                   0.91mpipe
                               water
                                                                                    Alum injection
                                      15.5m                68.9m
            FIGURE 11.1  Schematic of filtration plant at Sacramento, California, showing paddle-wheel flocculation basins and sedimentation basin
                                      3
            (Langelier, 1921). Q(design) ¼ 2.2 m =s (50 mgd); q(flocculation basins)   30 min; q(sedimentation basins)   63 h.



            11.3.1.4  Flocculation Practice, c. 1940           11.3.2.2  Smoluchowski’s Collision Equations
            Table 11.1 gives data from Camp (1955) for 14 flocculation  The equations of Smoluchowski are referenced frequently in
            basins, c. 1940. He computed tip velocity, v; detention time,  the literature as the starting point for discussion of kinetic
            u; headloss, h L , for baffled systems (or power consumed, P=Q,  theory of particle collisions. The Smoluchowski equation on
            for paddle-wheel basins); power per unit volume, P=V; G; and  orthokinetic motion was referenced by Harris et al. (1966,
            Gu. Of the 14 plants, most had end-around baffles; only four  p. 96) who credited its introduction into water treatment theory
            were paddle-wheel basins. The baffled basins were not satis-  to Camp and Stein (1943, Equation 23). They derived the
            factory according to Camp (1955, p. 5) because the gradients  equation from fundamentals, however, and did not cite Smo-
            were excessive at the bends and deficient in the straight  luchowski, i.e., probably they were not aware of his papers.
            portions. Camp’s 1955 paper was the basis for rational design  The enumeration of Smoluchowski’s equations here is from
            of floc basins, adopted widely in practice.         Argaman and Kaufman (1968, p. 5), which were described
                                                               previously in Section 10.2.3.1; the numbering is retained.

            11.3.2 EVOLUTION OF THEORY
                                                               11.3.2.2.1  Perikinetic Motion
            Three ‘‘milestones’’ in flocculation theory were (1) the equations
            of Smoluchowski for ‘‘perikinetic’’ and ‘‘orthokinetic,’’ fluid  The first equation of Smoluchowski (1916) was for the condition
            motion in 1916 and 1918, respectively; (2) the observations of  that collisions were due to Brownian motion (called ‘‘periki-
            Langelier, c. 1919, on the effect of slow stirring on the formation  netic’’ motion) calculated as the diffusion flux of particles in
            of settleable floc; and (3) the work of Camp in formulating the  the radial direction around a single stationary particle:
            basis for the theory and practice in 1943 (Camp and Stein, 1943)
                                                                                                  3
            and in 1955 (Camp, 1955), respectively.                       N(diffusion) ij ¼ 4pD ij (r i þ r j ) n i n j  (10:1)
            11.3.2.1  Langelier                                where
            As applied to water treatment practice, Langelier’s floccula-  N(diffusion) ij is the number of contacts per unit time per
            tion experiments as related to the Sacramento plant, c. 1919,  unit volume between i and j particles due to diffusion
                                                                                  3
            was the basis for an initial descriptive theory. Langelier  flux (collisions=m =s)
                                                                                                            2
            recognized the role of stirring in causing the growth of floc  D ij is the combined diffusion coefficient, D i þ D j (m =s)
            particles and used his jar-test apparatus as the means for  r i is the radius of particle i (m)
            investigating the effects of other independent variables.  r j is the radius of particle j (m)
                                                                                                               3
            Colloid chemistry entered the picture, c. 1941, through an  n i is the number concentration of particles of radius r i (#=m )
            MS thesis by H. Ludwig (Ludwig, 1942) under Langelier;  n j is the number concentration of particles of radius
                                                                         3
            the basis was Professor Hans Jenny’s course on the topic.  r j (#=m )
   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344