Page 175 - Gas Purification 5E
P. 175

162   Gas Piw$cation


                                           Table 2-30 (Continued)
                           Comparison of LPG Treater Operating Data with LLE Calculations

                    Case              7 Normal         7 Maximum             8
                                   Plant            Plant             Plant
                                   Data   Calculated   Data   Calculated   Data   Calculated
                    Hydrocarbon
                      Rate, gpm    250      250      200      205      105      105
                                    55      55        55      55       100      100
                      T, OF
                      P, psig      435      435      435      435      385      385
                    COz in, ppm    2,260   2,200     6,675    6,630    7,260   7,260
                    HIS in, ppm     -       -        -        -        -        -
                    C02 out, ppm    nil     0.90     138      74       660      158
                    HIS out. ppm    -       -         -       -        -        -
                    Amine          MEA     MEA       MEA      MEA      DEA     DEA
                      wt%           15       15       15       15       30      27
                      Flow, gallmin.   100   110     100       93       14      14
                      Ideal Stages**   -     1        -        1        -        1
                      Lean Loading*   0.20   0.20    0.38     0.38     0.03     0.03
                      Rich Loading*   0.22   0.22    0.46     0.45     0.25     0.32
                    Contactor       jet eductor-mixer   jet eductor-mixer   static mixer
                    Packing Type         -                 -                 -
                    Contactor  Dim., in.   -               -                 -
                    Xores:
                     *Loadings are mole of acid-  per mole of amine. A lean solution loading of 0.1 mohwl M.W assumed if  no
                      infornmioii was available.
                     **Equilibrium stages used in the absorber.
                    Source: Holmes et al. 11984)



                     Experimental data on the distribution of H2S between an aqueous h4DEA solution and liq-
                   uid propane have recently been reported by Carroll et al. (1993). A small portion of this data
                   is reproduced in Table 2-31. The results indicate that for solution loadings less than 1.0 mole
                   H2S/mole MDEA, there is a linear relationship between the logarithm of the amine loading
                   and the logarithm of the mole fraction H2S in the propane. The relationship is

                     delta log x / delta log R = 2.4                              (2-48)
                     Where: x = mole fraction H2S in liquid propane.
                          R = moles H2S/mole h4DEA in the aqueous solution.

                     This relationship indicates that an order of magnitude change in the solution loading results
                   in more than two orders of magnitude change in the concentration of HIS in the propane.
                     Data on the distribution of  C02 between phases in the system carbon dioxidepropane-
                   3M MDEA are reported by Jou et al. (1995B). The vapor-amine solution equilibrium data
                   were found to closely match predictions of  the Deshmukh-Mather (1981) correlation. The
                   vapor-liquid equilibrium for the system C02-propane appeared to fit the Peng-Robinson
                   (PR) equation of state.
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180