Page 240 - Gas Wettability of Reservoir Rock Surfaces with Porous Media
P. 240

224     Gas Wettability of Reservoir Rock Surfaces with Porous Media



                            6.3.2.4 EVALUATION OF TEMPERATURE RESISTANCE
                            During the experimental process, the antiswelling height and rate at room

                            temperature and 110 C were measured. The result is shown in Fig. 6.15.
                            It can be seen from the experimental data that there is no difference in the
                            antiswelling effect before and after trapezoid protection agent A is processed at

                            110 C. It is applicable to high temperature reservoirs with low permeability.

                            6.3.2.5 EVALUATION OF DAMAGE CAUSED TO RESERVOIRS WHEN
                            TRAPEZOID PROTECTION AGENT A BECOMES ADSORBED ON THE ROCK
                            SURFACE, AND TREATMENT PERIOD EVALUATION
                            A core flow tester was used to evaluate the damage due to adsorption of trape-
                            zoid protection agent. The experiment was conducted based on the oil and gas
                            industry standard   Article 6 of SY/T5971-94 Evaluation Method of Clay
                            Stabilizer for Water Injection. The experimental result is shown in Fig. 6.16 (the
                            core is taken from S2 upper layer of S56-10 well in Shengli Oilfield).
                            It can be seen from the experimental data that the trapezoid protection agent
                            A does not damage the reservoirs due to adsorption. When it is injected, the
                            permeability of cores increases slightly.
                            The core processed with adsorption damage was continually used in displace-
                            ment experiments. The antiswelling period evaluation was conducted by
                            injecting the modification water filtered at 2.2 μm, and expressed by changes
                            in permeability of core samples due to increase in injection volume. The
                            experimental results are shown in Fig. 6.17.
                            It can be seen from the experimental data that the trapezoid protection agent
                            A has better antiswelling functions. When the core is treated with 20 PV of
                            trapezoid protection agent A and 400 PV modification water is injected, the


                                        100


                                         80
                                       Antiswelling rate (%)  60           After heating



                                                                           Before heating
                                         40


                                         20
                                               2         4        6        8        10
                                                           Concentration (%)
                            FIGURE 6.15
                            Evaluation of result with high temperature resistance of trapezoid protection agent A.
   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245