Page 50 - Gas Wettability of Reservoir Rock Surfaces with Porous Media
P. 50

34      Gas Wettability of Reservoir Rock Surfaces with Porous Media



                            reservoir rocks. However, it is not sensitive when approaching intermediate-
                            wet. When contact angle is between 60B120 degrees, not all fluids will auto-
                            matically displace the other fluids, resulting in errors and interferences.
                            Furthermore, when the contact angle exceeds the limiting contact angle which
                            doesn’t generate spontaneous imbibitions depends on the initial saturation of
                            cores which directly affects wettability measurement of cores. McCaffery and
                            Morrow [9,10] measured spontaneous imbibitions of pure fluid in artificial
                            Teflon cores with known contact angle. It was found that octyl ether (θ 5 49
                            degrees) is not imbibed into dry cores but can be imbibed into cores saturated
                            with 30% original octyl ether. There is a larger error in measured result. If the
                            measured core contains soctyl ether, it is water-wet when measured with octyl
                            ether. If the measured core is originally dry, it is intermediate-wet when mea-
                            sured with octyl ether.
                            The Amott method is not sensitive to an intermediate-wet condition, which
                            significantly affects gas wettability evaluation. Therefore it is not suitable for
                            gas wettability evaluation.


                            2.1.3   USBM Method
                            The USBM method was proposed in 1969 by Donaldson et al. [11,12] to mea-
                            sure average wettability of cores. The underlying principle of this method is
                            that one fluid displaces another, and the effort required by a wetting-phase
                            fluid to displace a nonwetting phase fluid is less than that required for reverse
                            displacement. Furthermore, it has been proved that the effort required is in
                            direct proportion to the corresponding area under the capillary pressure curve
                            [13]. The wettability of pore medium is expressed with the obtained imbibi-
                            tions and displacement capillary pressure curve and the logarithm W 5 lg
                            (A 1 /A 2 ) of the ratio of the area under the curve, namely wettability. In the
                            equation, A1 and A2 are the areas that fall under oil-displacing and saline
                            water-displacing curves, respectively. When W is more than zero, the core is
                            water-wet. When W is less than zero, the core is oil-wet. Wettability close to
                            zero indicates that the core is intermediate-wet. The greater the absolute value
                            of W is, the greater the wettability bias [1].
                            When evaluating wettability, if the influence of pore geometric shapes is simi-
                            lar, experimental results are reproducibile, as USBM method draws support
                            from capillary pressure curve to determine wettability and the shape of capil-
                            lary pressure curve depends on the distribution of wettability of porous
                            medium and pore size.
                            The USBM method is more sensitive to intermediate-wet samples compared to
                            the Amott method. It can make use of reservoir fluid and is less time-
                            consuming. However, it can only determine the average wettability of porous
                            medium samples and cannot tell whether the sample is partially wet or mixed
                            wet. However, the Amott method is more sensitive to the case.
                            Experimental procedure for USBM method is as follows [11].
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55