Page 57 - gas transport in porous media
P. 57

50
                                     300
                                                0% Relative humidity                      Ong
                                                40% Relative humidity
                                   Mass sorbed / mass sorbent (mg/g)  200
                                     250
                                                70% Relative humidity
                                     150

                                     100


                                      50

                                      0
                                        0        20       40       60       80       100
                                              Relative vapor pressure of trichloroethylene (P/P )
                                                                               o
                           Figure 4.2.  Effect of relative humidity on trichloroethylene adsorption on alumina

                           coefficient, K can be written as:

                                      d
                                                      K d     θ    K iw A

                                                 K =      +      +                        (4.2)
                                                   d
                                                      K H   K H γ ρ  M
                                                                 3
                           whereK d isthesolid–gaspartitioncoefficient(m /g), K H isthedimensionlessHenry’s
                           law constant, θ is the moisture content (in fraction), K iw is water–gas partition coef-
                           ficient (m) for sorption at water–gas interface (g), A is the water–gas interfacial area
                             2
                           (m ), γ is the aqueous activity coefficient, and M is the mass of sorbent (g). Applying
                           the above equation and using the number of monolayers of water coverage instead
                           of the moisture content, Ong and Lion (1991c) were able to generalize the impact
                           of moisture on the solid–gas sorption. Figure 4.3 plots the total mass partitioned
                           onto the soil less the mass sorbed at the solid–water interface (represented by the
                           term, K d /K H ) versus the number of monolayers of water on the surface. As shown
                           in Figure 4.3, Ong and Lion found that for oven-dried minerals, direct adsorption
                           onto the solid surface of the minerals for TCE was a controlling factor. From oven-
                           dried to one monolayer coverage of water, direct sorption was evident with strong
                           competition from water for adsorption sites. The adsorption coefficient was found to
                           decrease by several orders of magnitude. Between a monolayer and six layer of water
                           molecules coverage, likely interactions include sorption of TCE onto surface bound
                           water and limited TCE dissolution into the sorbed water with some salting out effects
                           caused by the sorbed water structure. Beyond six monolayer of water molecules,
                           TCE dissolution into the condensed water, obeying Henry’s Law, and partitioning
                           at the solid–water interface were evident. At this moisture level, water behaves like
                           bulk water on the surface of the soil for the dissolution of VOC vapors (Ong and
   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62