Page 220 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 220

222                                                             Chapter 7




























             Fig. 7-15. An inference network for combining input fuzzy evidential maps for modeling of
             epithermal Au prospectivity in the Aroroy district (Philippines). FG = fuzzy gamma (γ) operator.
             A value of γ equal to 0.5 means that the output values of FG lies between the output values of
             fuzzy algebraic product and the output values of fuzzy algebraic sum.


             combine evidential fuzzy maps. The inference network also functions to filter out the
             effect of ambiguous evidence. For example, all NNW-trending faults/fractures in the
             case study area are  used to  create a  fuzzy evidence of  favourable  distance to these
             geological structures. However, it is certainly implausible that every  NNW-trending
             fault/fracture is associated  with mineralisation.  Therefore,  by logically combining  a
             fuzzy evidence of  proximity to NNW-trending  faults/fractures  with another  fuzzy
             evidence, only the contributions of both or either of the two evidential fuzzy sets are
             transmitted to the output depending on the hypothesis. There are no general guidelines
             for designing  a fuzzy inference network, except that as  much as possible it should
             emulate knowledge  of how the mineral deposits  of the type sought were  formed and
             what spatial features or combinations of spatial features indicate where mineral deposits
             of the type sought may occur. Thus, a  fuzzy inference network must adequately
             represent the conceptual model of mineral prospectivity.
                Fig. 7-15 shows an example of an inference network that can be applied to combine
             fuzzy evidential maps for modeling epithermal Au prospectivity in the case study area.
             This inference network is quite similar to, but in detail different from,  the Boolean
             inference  network in Fig.  7-4. The use of a value  of  γ equal to  0.5 implies that the
             intermediate or final output  maps portray contributions of either complementary  or
             supplementary pieces of spatial evidence, meaning that the output values lie (a) between
             output values of FAP and output values of FAS or (b) between output values of FA and
   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225