Page 24 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 24

Predictive Modeling of Mineral Exploration Targets                    19





















           Fig. 1-5. Deposit occurrences overlaid on (or crossed with) classified Cu data. Cross-table output
           showing number of deposit occurrences in every class of Cu data. The analysis indicates that >75
           percentile Cu values are significant Cu anomalies.

              Specific tools for certain data analysis may not be available in some GIS software
           packages. In such cases, data  must be exported or converted to formats supported by
           other computer software packages that  provide the  specific tools of interest. The
           examples  given here  and several other forms of  data analysis demonstrated in the
           succeeding chapters support the creation of maps of evidential features (e.g., significant
           geochemical anomalies), which are eventually integrated to model mineral prospectivity.
           Note that the  example of  data analysis via two-map overlay of Cu data and mineral
           deposit occurrence data (Fig. 1-5) is already a form of data integration.

           Data integration
              The behaviour of indirectly observable and complex real-world system of interest,
           such as a geochemical anomaly or  mineralisation, is controlled by several interacting
           processes. In order to predict the behaviour of such systems, it is instructive to combine
           or integrate sets of data, pieces of geo-information or models representing the individual
           processes involved. In a GIS, a predictive model or map is usually derived by combining
           predictor maps (Fig.  1-2) via a computational function that aptly characterises the
           interactions or relationships among the processes that control the behaviour of a system
           of interest:

            predictive  mod el =  ( f  predictor  maps  ).

           There are different forms of the computational function f. The choice of a computational
           function depends  on whether the predictive  model is stochastic, empirical or hybrid
           stochastic-empirical. Unlike predictive modeling of geochemical anomalies, which can
           be stochastic, predictive modeling of mineral prospectivity  usually makes  use of
   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29