Page 273 - Geochemical Anomaly and Mineral Prospectivity Mapping in GIS
P. 273

276                                                             Chapter 8

                                                    th
                                                                                 th
             The degree of plausibility  ( Pls C ji  ) for the  j   C ji (j=1,2,…,m) class of the  i   X i
             (i=1,2,…,n) spatial evidence map with respect to D is, according to the relationships of
             the EBFs (see Chapter 7, Fig. 7-18), estimated as

             Pls C  ji  =  Bel C  ji  +  Unc C ji  .                            (8.7)


                There are two problems associated with the application of equations (8.4) to (8.6).
             Firstly, because N (C  ji ) =  N (C ∩  D ) +  [N  (C  ji ) −  N (C ∩  D )] , it follows that
                                        ji
                                                            ji
             Unc C in equation (8.6) is equal to [0], whereas there is always uncertainty. Secondly,
                  ji
             equations (8.4) and (8.5) represent conditional probability that a mineral deposit of the
             type sought exists and does not exist, respectively,  given  C ij.  The estimates of  both
             Bel C ji   and  Dis C  ji   via equations (8.4) and (8.5), respectively, thus represent the
                                            th
                             th
             relationship of the j  C ij class in the i  X i spatial evidence map with D only but do not
                                                                                 th
                                        th
                                                               th
             represent the relationship of the j  C ij class with the other m  C mi classes in the i  X i
             spatial evidence map. Chung and Fabbri (1993) aver that the relationships among the
             classes in an evidential map, aside  from their spatial relationships to  D, must  be
             considered and represented in a mathematical function f (see equations (8.1) and (8.2))
             for combining predictor maps  of mineral prospectivity. The  following modified
             equations (Carranza, 2002; Carranza and Hale, 2003) have been proposed to overcome
             the problems associated with equations (8.4) to (8.6).
                                                         th
                                th
                The  Bel C ji   for the j  C ji (j=1,2,…,m) class of the i  X i (i=1,2,…,n) spatial evidence
             map with respect to D is re-defined and estimated as

                      W C  D
             Bel C ji  =  m  ji  ,                                              (8.8a)
                     ¦ W   D
                      = j 1  C ji

                              N (C ∩  D )
                                  ji
                                N (C  )
                                    ij
             where  W C ji D  =  N (D ) −  N (C ∩  D )  .                      (8.8b)
                                      ji
                             N  (T ) −  N  (C ji  )

             The numerator in equation (8.8b) is the conditional probability that D exists given the
             presence of  C ji. It  means simply that a target mineral deposit occurs in  C ji. The
             denominator in equation  (8.8b) is the conditional probability that  D exists given the
             absence of C ij. It means simply that a target mineral deposit occurs outside C ji. Thus, the
             W C  ji D   is the relative weight of every C ji in terms of D being more likely present instead
   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278