Page 233 - Geology of Carbonate Reservoirs
P. 233

214    SUMMARY: GEOLOGY OF CARBONATE RESERVOIRS



                   Two fields were chosen for this first section because they offer case histories that
               include work done by the author and his students. First - hand examination of the

               rock and reservoir properties in these fi elds confirmed that these examples are suit-
               able for inclusion in the rather rare category of depositional reservoirs because
               diagenetic alteration of pore geometry and type has been nominal. The examples
               are North Haynesville Field in Louisiana (Jurassic Smackover Formation) and
               Conley Field in Texas (Mississippian Chappel Formation). Production at North

               Haynesville Field is from slightly modified interparticle porosity in ooid – peloid –
                 rhodolite grainstones (Bishop,  1968 ; Ahr and Hull,  1983 ). Production at Conley Field
               is from slightly altered intraparticle porosity in fragmented, crinoid – bryozoan grain-
               stones and packstones (Ahr and Walters,  1985 ). In both examples, the depositional
               facies boundaries closely correspond to the outlines of underlying paleostructural
               highs. The paleostructural feature at North Haynesville Field is a salt anticline that
               has changed shape since the time of Smackover deposition such that part of the
               present structural crest has moved. It no longer conforms exactly to the shape of
               the grainstone buildup that originally formed on the crest of the salt dome. Skeletal
               grainstones at Conley Field were deposited on the crest of an anticedent high inter-
               preted to be a horst block that has undergone several episodes of vertical movement
               accompanied by moderate erosion. In the Conley Field example, present structure
               closely conforms to the outlines of depositional reservoir bodies indicating that
               present structure is a reliable guide for determining drilling locations — a fi rst step
               in the development of a geological concept for exploration and development. In the
               North Haynesville example, the outlines of the depositional reservoir and present
               structure are slightly offset but interval isopach maps reveal the shape of the original
               salt structure that corresponds more closely to depositional facies boundaries.

               8.3.2.1  North Haynesville Field

               Location and General Information   North Haynesville is one of several Smackover


               fields in North Louisiana associated with faulted salt anticlines (Figure  8.1 ). Our
               study began after this field had been developed so that a large amount of geological

               data was available. Borehole cores provided us with an excellent opportunity to
               identify genetic pore types (interparticle in ooid – peloid – rhodolite grainstones and
               packstones), wireline logs enabled us to correlate stratigraphic intervals and tops
               with which to map the reservoir body (an elongate grainstone – packstone sand wave,
               or tidal bar complex, lying on the paleocrest of a faulted salt ridge), and core analy-
               ses along with data from wireline logs enabled us to describe reservoir fl ow units
               by their porosity and permeability characteristics.


               Structural Setting   The present structure at North Haynesville Field (Figure  8.2 )
               was mapped by Bishop ( 1968 ) as an elongate, faulted anticline. Our remapping from

               wireline log data confirmed Bishop ’ s interpretation. Faulted anticlines are typical in
               the salt basins of the Ancestral Gulf of Mexico. In the East Texas, North Louisiana,
               and Mississippi salt basins these halokinetic structures produce a variety of struc-
               tural shapes and sizes depending on the thickness of salt beneath the structure, the
               distance from the updip edge of the salt, the amount of overburden, and the length
               of time the structure had been growing. Salt structures are known as  “ salt ridges,
               pillows, and domes ”  depending on the thickness and shape of the structure. Salt
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238