Page 130 - Geometric Modeling and Algebraic Geometry
P. 130

7 Curve Parametrization Exploiting the Newton Polygon  131
                           7.5.3 Adjoint divisors and a canonical divisor

                           Now we want to define the adjoint order at a point P ∈ C which is given by a

                           valuation ν P of K(C). In sections 7.3.3 and 7.3.4 we have seen that giving ν P is
                           the same as giving a (primitive) injective homomorphism ϕ P : K(C) → K((t)).
                           Assume that Center(ν P ) ∈ U i . We define the adjoint order (see also [6, Remark
                           2.5] and 7.7.1 in the example section) as follows:

                                                       ∂f           d ϕ P (u i )
                                            α ν P  := ν P   − ord t
                                                       ∂v i           d t
                           It can be shown that this definition is indeed independent of the choice of ϕ P and if
                                                       =0. Further the adjoint order at conjugate points
                           Q is a smooth point of C then α ν P
                                                   for σ ∈ Gal(K | K).So
                           is the same, i.e. α ν P  = α ν σP

                                                  A :=    α ν P ν ∈ Div(C)


                                                        ν
                           where ν runs over all discrete valuations of K(C) is a well defined K-rational divisor.

                           It is actually given by the finite sum  ν∈V Sing(C)  α ν P ν .
                           Definition 9. With the above notation we define the shifted adjoint divisor
                                                      K I := D I − A.



                              Note that K I is the difference of two K-rational divisors and hence K-rational as


                           well. We know that deg(A)=2     δ Q (see for example [8, p. 1620]). Together

                                                       Q∈C
                           with lemma 6 and theorem 4 this implies:
                           Corollary 10. The degree of the divisor K I is deg(K I )= d I − 2.


                                        ∼
                              We have C = P and so a divisor on C is canonical if it has degree −2.In

                                            1
                                            K
                           particular K ∅ is a canonical divisor. The importance of the divisors K I stems from


                           the following theorem:
                                                                   (K I )  = ∅ and we can compute a

                           Theorem 11. If I  =[1,n] and d I ≥ 2 then L   C
                           basis in K(C).
                           Proof. See [1, Theorem 17].
                           Let us briefly recall the algorithm within the constructive proof. We start with the
                           K-vector space L S (D I ) (for a basis of that space see lemma 2 above) and com-
                           pute the subspace V := {h ∈L S (D I ) | ν I (h) ≥ α ν for all ν ∈V Sing(C) }. Then
                           dim K (V )= d I − 1. A priori V is a space of rational functions on the surface S,but
                           it can be considered a space of rational functions over C or C as well. It turns out

                                                   ∼
                           that via this identification V = L   C (K I ) as K-vector spaces. We will execute this
                           algorithm several times on an example in section 7.7. There it will also become clear
                           that a basis in K(C) can be computed.
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135