Page 74 - Geothermal Energy Systems Exploration, Development, and Utilization
P. 74

50  2 Exploration Methods
                               reactivation and leakage potential of any fault population within the stress field
                               under initial and changing pore pressure conditions. For the EGS project at
                               Groß Sch¨ onebeck in the Northeast German Basin, this approach was successfully
                               applied to describe the stress state along faults under initial and modified formation
                               pressure, and finally to assess the fault reactivation potential and to understand
                               recorded microseismic events during massive water stimulation (Moeck, Kwiatek,
                               and Zimmermann, in press).
                                 The slip tendency is the ratio of resolved shear stress to resolved normal stress
                               on a surface (Morris, Ferrill, and Henderson, 1996). It is based on Amonton’s law
                               that governs fault reactivation:
                                          ∗
                                    τ = µ s σ neff                                         (2.2)
                                where τ is the shear stress, σ neff the effective normal stress (σ n –P p ), and µ s the
                               sliding friction coefficient (Byerlee, 1978). According to this law, stability or failure
                               is determined by the ratio of shear stress to normal stress acting on the plane
                               of weakness and defined as slip tendency T s (Lisle and Srivastava, 2004; Morris,
                               Ferrill, and Henderson, 1996). Slip is likely to occur on a surface if resolved shear
                               stress, τ, equals or exceeds the frictional sliding coefficient and slip tendency is
                               given as

                                    τ s = T/σ neff ≥ µ s                                   (2.3)
                                 The shear and effective normal stress acting on a given plane depend on the
                               orientation of the planes within the stress field that is defined by principal effective
                               stresses σ 1eff = (σ 1 − P p ) > σ 2eff = (σ 2 − P p ) > σ 3eff = (σ 3 − P p )(Jaeger, Cook, and
                               Zimmerman, 2007):
                                             ∗ 2
                                                       2
                                                             ∗ 2
                                    σ neff = σ 1eff l + σ 2eff m + σ 3eff n                (2.4)
                                                     ∗
                                        	       2 2  2       2  2 2        2 2 2 1/2

                                    T = (σ 1 − σ 2 ) l m + (σ 2 − σ 3 ) m n + (σ 3 − σ 1 ) l n  (2.5)
                               where l, m,and n are the direction cosines of the plane’s normal with respect
                               to the principal stress axes, σ 1 , σ 2 ,and σ 3 respectively. Equations (2.4 and 2.5)
                               define effective normal stress and shear stress for compressional stress regimes,
                               that is, σ 1eff is horizontal. Extensional and strike-slip regimes can be derived by
                               changing the order of the direction cosines in these equations (Ramsay and Lisle,
                               2000).
                                 Dilation of faults and fractures is largely controlled by the resolved normal stress
                               which is basically a function of lithostatic and tectonic stresses and fluid pressure.
                               On the basis of Equation (2.4), the magnitude of normal stress can be computed
                               for surfaces of all orientation within a known or suspected stress field. This normal
                               stress can be normalized by comparison with the differential stress resulting in the
                               dilation tendency τ d for a surface defined by
                                         (σ 1 − σ n )
                                    τ d =                                                  (2.6)
                                         (σ 1 − σ 3 )
                                 Slip and dilation tendency stereoplots are obtained by solving Equations (2.3
                               and 2.4) for all planes in 3D space, substituting in Equation (2.2) for shear
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79