Page 83 - Global Project Management Handbook
P. 83

3-16          STATE OF THE ART OF GLOBAL PROJECT MANAGEMENT

        part of quadrant 1 for the four periods under study and the emergence of the cluster
        planning in period 2002–2004 (quadrant 2) because it reflects the strategic role of proj-
        ect. Table 3.2 gives the content of the cluster training according to the periods considered.
           From this table it is possible to study the indepth evolution of the cluster during the
        various time periods. Table 3.3 summarizes the main information needed to analyze each
        cluster.
           We can see that the cluster training is neither complex through the various time peri-
        ods (complexity = number of internal links/number of words), nor it is strongly connected
        (low percentage of connectivity). This indicates that the theme is not well defined and
        still moving, as indicates the transformation index. The transformation index is high (36
        between 1985–1991 and 1992–1996), showing an almost complete transformation of the
        content of this cluster (just one word is in common), and then decreases to 5.71 (from
        1992–1996 to 1997–2001), showing more consistency; it then increases to 8 between
        1997–2001 and 2002–2004, which means that this theme is still moving in terms of
        content but is starting to gain in consistency. This indicates that there is still a need for
        clarification, although the cluster is in quadrant 1 during the various periods under con-
        sideration, as well as for further research or study.
           Let’s now consider the emergence of the cluster planning between 1996–2001 and
        2002–2004. Table 3.4 shows the provenance of this cluster.
           The cluster planning (2002–2004) comes from 22 clusters of the preceding period
        (1996–2001). Of 25 words constituting the cluster planning, 24 come from clusters of the
        preceding period. Four clusters have a special importance in this genesis: budget (quad-
        rant 1, provenance index 0.31), managing (quadrant 3, provenance index 0.31), phase



        TABLE 3.2  Content of the Cluster Training According the Different Periods of Time
               1985–1991      1992–1996    1997–2001      2002–2004

         1     education      contract     designer       visual
         2     training       supply       education      leadership
         3     knowledge      personnel    training       classroom
         4     course         program      curriculum     knowledge
         5     communication  training     teaching       mentoring

         6     manager        learning     classroom      customized
         7     sense          teaching     instructional  interactive
         8     completion     evaluation   instructor     training
         9     end            summative    lecture        learning
        10     human          proposal     program        leader
        11     executive      writing      learning       ca
        12     chief          instructional  manager      booth
        13     success        instruction  course         coaching
        14                    interactive  faculty        staff
        15                    multimedia   student        education
        16                    classroom    capstone      knowledge management
        17                    designer     undergraduate  organizational learning
        18                    bid                         course
        19                    developer                   multimedia
        20                    assembly                    object
        21                    collaborative               occupational
        22                    funding                     vocational
        23                    evaluating                  boundary
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88