Page 283 - Global Tectonics
P. 283

268   CHAPTER 9



                          (a)

                                      α
                                            surface slope
                                                                Toe
                                Accretionary wedge        α + β
                                           Décollement  β




                          (b)

                                10°



                                8°   0.5 0.4
                                    0.7  0.6  λ = λ b  =0
                                                   Guatemala
                               Surface slope, α  6°        Sunda
                                     0.8
                                                             Japan
                                                              Peru
                                     0.9
                                           Aleutian
                                4°
                                                                 Java
                                                                   Oregon
                                       Makran
                                2°  0.97
                                                                      Barbados overall
                                       Barbados toe
                                0°
                                  0°      2°     4°     6°      8°     10°    12°
                                                      Basal dip, β

           Figure 9.21  (a) Schematic profile of a Coulomb wedge and (b) theoretical wedge tapers for various pore fl uid pressure

           ratios (l) for submarine accretionary prisms, assuming the pressure at the base is identical to that in the wedge (modifi ed
           from Davis et al., 1993, by permission of the American Geophysical Union. Copyright © 1993 American Geophysical Union).
                                                                                     −3
           Boxes in (b) indicate tapers of active wedges. Calculations involved a wedge sediment density of 2400 kg m .



           many other phenomena that are associated with prisms,   2000; Morris & Villinger, 2006). Some of these conduits
           including mud volcanoes and diapirs (Westbrook   coincide with thrust faults overlying the décollement
           et al., 1984), and the development of unique chemical   zone, whose high fracture permeability allows fl uid to
           and biological environments at the leading edge of   escape (Gulick  et al., 2004; Tsuji  et al., 2006). Fluid
           the prism (Schoonmaker, 1986; Ritger  et al., 1987)   escape in this way implies that the décollement zone

           (Fig. 9.19).                                 possesses a lower fluid pressure than its surroundings,
             In addition to a mechanism by which pore fl uid pres-  a condition that is in apparent conflict with the evidence


           sure increases by rapid burial, there also are competing   of high pore fluid pressures in this zone. However, the

           mechanisms that decrease pore fluid pressure within a   apparent conflict can be reconciled by models in which



           wedge. Fluids tends to flow along narrow, high perme-  the fluid pressure in the décollement zone varies both
           ability channels and exit to the décollement and the   spatially and temporally within the wedge. The nature
           seafloor through vertical and lateral conduits (Silver,   of these variations, and their affect on the evolution of
   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288