Page 316 - Global Tectonics
P. 316

OROGENIC BELTS  299



                   Cembrano (2004) inferred the strength of the   explain differences in the degree of
                   interface by finding the smallest displacement   subduction erosion (Section 9.6) along the

                   field for different ranges of slip parameters.  margin, although alternative models (e.g.

                 Figure 10.8c summarizes the results of the     von Huene et al., 2004) have been proposed.
                   modeling. In the plots, the viscosity of the      In addition to the rate and age of subducting
                   slip interface controls its strength. The slab   lithosphere, another factor that may control
                   dip, convergence rate, and the age of the    the strength of inter-plate coupling along the
                   subducting plate also are shown for          Peru–Chile Trench is the amount of surface
                   comparison. The results indicate that the    erosion and deposition. Lamb & Davis (2003)
                   strongest inter-plate coupling occurs in the   postulated that the cold water current that
                   central Andes near latitude 21°S (Fig. 10.8a)   fl ows along the coast of Chile and Peru
                   where inner trench slopes are steepest and   inhibits water evaporation, resulting in little
                   the age of subducted crust is oldest. Weak   rainfall, small amounts of erosion, and
                   coupling occurs in the southern Andes south   minimal sediment transport into the trench.
                   of 35°S where the age of ocean crust is      A dry, sediment-starved trench may result in

                   significantly younger and trench slopes are   a high degree of friction along the Nazca–
                   gentle. For a constant convergent rate, the   South American plate interface, increasing
                   subduction of young oceanic crust and        shear stress, and leading to increased
                   aseismic ridges results in weak coupling     compression and uplift in the central Andes.
                   because the higher temperature of the        By contrast, in the southern Andes where the
                   oceanic lithosphere in these zones results in a   fl ow of westerly winds, abundant rainfall,
                   thermal resetting of the ocean–continent     and the effects of glaciation result in high
                   interface.                                   erosion rates, the Peru–Chile Trench is fi lled
                 In the backarc-foreland domain, deformation is   with sediment. The presence of large
                   controlled by the absolute velocity of the   quantities of weak sediment in this region
                   continental plate, its rheology, and the     may reduce friction along the plate interface,
                   strength of inter-plate coupling at the trench   effectively reducing the amount of shear
                   (Yáñez & Cembrano, 2004). Strong coupling    stress and resulting in less topographic uplift
                   results in large amounts of compression in   and less intra-plate deformation.
                   the backarc, which increases crustal
                   shortening and thickening. Very weak     2  The structure and rheology of the continental plate.
                   coupling prevents backarc shortening. The   Variations in the initial structure and rheology
                   rheology of the continental plate is governed   of the continental plate also can explain several

                   by the strength of the mantle lithosphere and   first-order differences in the evolution of the
                   the temperature at the Moho. By varying the   central and southern Andes. Among these
                   strength of coupling at the slip zone and   differences are the underthrusting of the
                   incorporating a temperature- and strain rate-  Brazilian Shield beneath the Altiplano-Puna and
                   sensitive power-law rheology (Section 2.10.3),   major lithospheric thinning in the central
                   these authors reproduced several major     Andes, and the absence of these features in the
                   features of the central and southern Andes.   southern Andes.
                   These include variations in the average      Sobolev & Babeyko (2005) conducted a series
                   topographic relief of the Andes, the observed   of two-dimensional thermomechanical
                   shortening rate and crustal thickness in the   models (Fig. 10.9) that simulated deformation
                   Altiplano region, and block rotations (Section   in the central and southern Andes using two
                   10.2.3). The rotations are induced by        different initial structures. The central Andes
                   differences in buoyancy forces caused by     involve a thick felsic upper crust, a thin
                   crustal thickness variations and in the      gabbroic lower crust, and a total thickness of

                   strength of inter-plate coupling north and   40–45 km. This configuration presumes that
                   south of the Altiplano. Variations in the    the crust already had been shortened prior to
                   strength of inter-plate coupling also may    the start of deformation at 30–35 Ma
   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321