Page 43 -
P. 43

18  •  Green Project Management



             component and an indirect component. Let’s look at your own home’s car-
             bon footprint as an example. The direct component includes such things as
             the output of your home heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC)
             system, or the gas mileage of your car, for instance. The indirect compo-
             nent includes items like the energy it takes to deliver the things you buy, the
             transportation for your groceries, or the energy it takes to manufacture your
             television set. It is also important because it can be somewhat mitigated—or
             at least reduced—by actively reducing energy consumption, by specifying
             products whose makers have reduced their carbon footprint or, when that
             isn’t enough, by purchasing or trading carbon offsets, which is something of
             a controversial subject: “Buying offsets for an energy-wasteful home or busi-
             ness and calling it environmentally responsible is akin to buying a Diet Coke
             to go with your double bacon cheeseburger—and calling it a weight-loss pro-
             gram. Efficiency (and calorie reduction!) comes first” (Joel Makower). 1



              Purchasing carbon offsets is a personal decision. Here are a few com-
              panies  that  offer  the  service:  terrapass  (http://www.terrapass.com),
              NativeEnergy  (http://www.native  energy.com),  Carbonfund  (http://
              www.carbonfund.org), among others.



               You may not think you have much control over the indirect component
             of your carbon footprint, but you do. For example, you can mitigate the
             transportation of your groceries by buying local products when you can,
             utilizing farmers markets during the summer, or purchasing at an area
             farm stand. Carbon offsets are another way to mitigate both direct and
             indirect components of your carbon footprint. But, as mentioned earlier,
             they are controversial in the fact that they can be perceived as being an
             excuse to pollute. “I don’t have to reduce my carbon emissions. All I have
             to do is buy carbon offsets to mitigate those emissions.” As a project man-
             ager, your personal code of ethics, even if you are not a member of the
             Project Management Institute and don’t necessarily adhere to their Code
             of Ethics and Professional Conduct, would not allow such an argument.
             Carbon offsets are effective when used as intended. It is the responsible
             thing to do in situations where an organization or individual has a plan
             for zero emissions, and is working toward that plan. Until they get to zero
             emissions, the organization or individual can buy carbon offsets to fund
             equivalent savings, or momentum toward those savings, elsewhere. Once
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48