Page 114 - Handbook Of Multiphase Flow Assurance
P. 114

110                        5.  Flow restrictions and blockages in operations

                 2.  Build a multiphase flow model
                   Construct a multiphase model of a flow line to determine the areas of water holdup accu-
                 mulation. Determine the superficial liquid flow velocity for these areas. One or more of these
                 areas are prone to hydrate plugging. The key factor is whether or not the formed hydrate
                 particles are carried out by the flow or remain in the “low spot.”
                   If hydrate conditions are present throughout the flowline, one may need to rely on the
                 segments of increased liquid holdup for prediction of the likely blockage location. Segments
                 with liquid holdups higher than in other locations of the flow line may be the likely locations
                 of hydrate accumulations. Multiple blockages may be present.
                 3.  Establish the pipeline segment where hydrate conditions are present
                   Determine the pipeline segment where hydrate conditions are present. In most cases the
                 hydrate conditions are present in 100% of a shut-in flow line. Exceptions may include warmer
                 climates where some sections of the flow line are exposed to an ambient temperature warmer
                 than the hydrate conditions.
                 4.  Determine hydrate particle mobility
                   Use a solids transport model to estimate the flow velocities required to avoid solids settling
                 out in two phase pipeline flow. Beggs and Brill flow and Thomas' friction velocity correlations
                 may be used to determine the minimum transport condition at the transition to intermittent
                 boundary line.
                   The Thomas' correlation based on the Oak Ridge National Lab work (1961, 1962) can be
                 separated into two models. The upper model is used when the particle diameter exceeds the
                 laminar sub layer thickness, the lower model is used when the particle diameter is less than
                 that of the laminar sub layer. Unfortunately it has been shown that the upper model is only
                 suitable for use with high superficial gas velocities and that it greatly over predicts the pres-
                 sure drop at low superficial gas velocities. The new approach is that under conditions where
                 solids are larger than the laminar sub layer the maximum superficial liquid velocity predicted
                 by the lower model gives the highest superficial liquid velocity required to ensure particle
                 transport. This approach always gives conservatively high liquid velocities when compared
                 to all the values for three phase gas/liquid/solid flow.
                                                                           3
                   The default value for the density of hydrate particles is 50 lb/ft . The minimum frictional
                 pressure drop required to avoid settling can then be calculated.
                                                                                   4
                   Thomas (1961) indicates that Reynolds numbers as high as 2.9–3.6 × l0  are required to
                 prevent solids deposition.
                   A recent model for gas hydrate deposition from water saturated vapor in deadlegs was
                 presented by Zhang (2017), which allows to estimate hydrate plug potential by a different
                 mechanism of hydrate deposition by condensation from vapor in vertical short pipe sections
                 without flow.

                 Prevention of hydrate formation

                   Hydrate easily plugs production systems and should be either avoided or managed both
                 in flowing and shut production and injection systems.
                   On production system shut-in, the fluid cooldown time should be no less than a sum of
                 time to safe out the system by normal operating procedure plus the no-touch time. No-touch
                 time should be no less than 2 hours to allow operator to respond, to reset control systems and
   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119