Page 305 - Handbook Of Multiphase Flow Assurance
P. 305

304                          10.  Research methods in flow assurance

                 Effect of adding kinetic hydrate inhibitors on the morphology of growing hydrate
                 THF + water + inhibitors solution without salt
                   The next step in studying hydrate crystal growth was to identify the effect of inhibitor
                 polymers on the morphology and the growth rate of THF hydrate crystals. The follow-
                 ing chemicals were tested: poly(vinylpyrrolidone), poly(vinyl-caprolactam) and a random
                 copolymer of vinylpyrrolidone, vinylcaprolactam, and dimethylaminoethylmethacrylate.
                 These compounds are referred to as PVP, PVCap, and VC-713 respectively. These chemicals
                 provide hydrate inhibition in both THF and natural gas systems, showing that the THF-
                 water system is a good model for structure II hydrate formation from natural gas (Lederhos
                 et al., 1996).
                   In this work concentrations of 0.5 wt% and 0.1 wt% were tested at temperatures of +1, +2,
                 and +3 °C. We studied the solutions of PVP, PVCap, or VC-713 of both high (89 K or higher)
                 and low (10 K or less) molecular weights. The studied polymeric inhibitor chemicals were
                 obtained from BASF. Solid samples of the investigated inhibitors were dissolved in deionized
                 water obtained from IBM Labs. If an inhibitor was available in an alcohol solution, the solvent
                 was removed by evacuation.
                   An unusual phenomenon was observed when we added kinetic inhibitors to the aqueous
                 THF solution. The shape of the THF hydrate crystal grown in the presence of these chemicals
                 changed from octahedral (3-D) to planar hexagonal (2-D) (Figs. 10.64 and 10.65). Faces of the
                 hexagonal plate were postulated to be {111} since the angles at which faces meet are same as
                 in an octahedral crystal. Another evidence supporting the hypothesis that the planar crystal
                 faces are {111} is the growth of a plane on an octahedral crystal grown without an inhibitor
                 and then moved into inhibited solution (Larsen et al., 1996, this work). The plane is parallel
                 to the {111} face of the octahedral crystal from which it grew (Fig. 10.66) which also indicates
                 a {111} plane.
                   The same effect was observed both at a 0.5 wt% concentration and at the lower concentra-
                 tion of 0.1 wt% of these chemicals in the test solution. All crystals grown in the presence of
                 hydrate inhibitors had visible defects. After hydrate crystals reached the sample tube walls,
                 hydrate also started to grow on the tube walls.
                   We hypothesize that the polymer chains of kinetic inhibitors adsorbed on the {111} surface
                 of the THF hydrate by hydrogen-bonding and blocked the further crystal growth. One possi-
                 ble explanation of the preference of the inhibitor adsorption towards the {111} face is that {111}
                 is the only surface available for adsorption since it's the slowest-growing face and other faces
                 have insufficient area for polymer adsorption on them. Another explanation may appeal to
                 the nature of {111} face. Inhibitor may adsorb stronger to {111} face compared to the other
                 faces because of a higher density of adsorption sites on that face.
                   We observed that the hydrate crystal growth was not completely inhibited by the kinetic
                 inhibitors at the concentrations listed above at the supercooling of 3.4 K, while at a lower
                 supercooling of 1.4 K the growth can be inhibited completely at a certain inhibitor concentra-
                 tion (Larsen et al., 1996; Makogon et al., 1997). The formed planar crystals grew in thickness,
                 as well as along the edge. This observation suggests that the adsorbed polymer allows for
                 hydrate growth beneath it. Otherwise, the polymer molecules must have been occluded by
                 the growing hydrate; however, the NMR study of hydrates by Ripmeester (1995) does not
                 confirm the occlusion phenomenon.
   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310