Page 485 - Handbook of Battery Materials
P. 485

458  15 Lithiated Carbons

                         3

                       2.5 2

                      E / V vs. Li/Li +  1.5 1






                       0.5
                         0
                          0        200       400       600
                                        C / Ah·kg -1

                    Figure 15.15  First-cycle constant-current charge/discharge
                    curve of hard carbon (‘Carbotron P’). The figure has been
                    reproduced with kind permission of Kureha Chemical Indus-
                    try Co., Ltd. (Morimoto, S. Kureha Chemical Industry Co.,
                    Ltd., personal communication.)

                    millivolts vs Li/Li (Figures 15.15 and 15.16b). Compared with graphitic carbons
                                  +
                    and cokes, which show volume expansions and contractions in the region of ∼10%
                    during lithium intercalation and de-intercalation, the hard carbons are claimed not
                    to be subject to dimensional changes during lithium uptake and removal because
                    of the high separation (∼0.380 nm) between neighboring carbon layers [235]. In
                    order to explain the high capability for lithium storage in nongraphitizing carbons,
                    Dahn et al. [50, 239, 243, 244, 270, 271] suggested that lithium is ‘adsorbed’ on
                    both sides of single graphene layer sheets which are arranged like a ‘house of
                    cards’ [243] or like ‘falling cards’ [244] (Figure 15.16a). The ‘falling cards’ model is
                    the advanced form of the ‘house of cards’ model and also takes into account the
                    storage of lithium in micropores. The accumulation of lithium in the micropores
                    is in line with other mechanisms proposing the storage of lithium clusters or
                    agglomerates in specific carbon ‘spaces’ (Morimoto, S. Kureha Chemical Industry
                    Co., Ltd., personal communication) [234, 235]. Both the pore size and the pore
                    openings should be small to avoid the reaction of stored lithium with the electrolyte
                    [51, 239, 270, 272]. The proportion of nanopores in the carbons can be expected
                    to increase with the cross-linking density of the precursor material [225, 233, 273].
                                                            ◦
                    Recent studies on a hard carbon prepared at 1000 C reveal that the sizes of the
                    single layers as well as the sizes of the pores are in the region of 1 nm [274]. In
                    addition to microporosity, micro-texture should also be considered [273].
                      In conclusion, a high proportion of single-layer sheets and nanopores is beneficial
                    for the lithium storage capabilities of hard carbons. On the other hand, heat
                                      ◦
                    treatment, above 1000 C, leads to drastically increased irreversible specific charges
                    of hard carbons [249, 275]. This may be related to the burn-off of material, which
                    causes the opening of the nanopores. Electrolyte can penetrate in, and the sites
   480   481   482   483   484   485   486   487   488   489   490