Page 20 - Handbook of Biomechatronics
P. 20

Introduction                                                  13


              more pronounced than in fusion of mechatronics and biological systems;
              resulting in an evident challenge faced by existing intradisciplinary design
              tools and methodologies. An appreciation of design anatomy could therefore
              assist in distinguishing a qualified location for the design methodology
              within a biomechatronic project environment.
                 The thought process involved in a design takes an iterative shape
              resulting in a three-phase pattern of divergence, systematization, and con-
              vergence. Each of these phases has proposed techniques, methods, and pro-
              cedures within individual engineering disciplines. The total sum of these
              phases are termed as the design process. In this process, analysis of the search
              space and generation of solution variants form the general content of the
              diverging phase. This is followed by the structuring activities which are pri-
              marily a combination of synthesis, intradisciplinary methodologies, and
              designer skills and experience. The converging phase, on the other hand,
              predominantly consists of the selection process with two steps of evaluation
              and decision. Here an important factor is the nature of the criteria which is
              used in determining the value scales and the basis of comparison for assessing
              the range of solution variants. Evaluation emerges as the central element in
              the design process where the design tools begin to play their role.




                   7 DEVELOPMENTS IN DESIGNS

                   The progressive advancements of biomechatronic systems are occa-
              sionally marked by groundbreaking contributions of unique designs.
              A closer scrutiny, however, reveals that in practice a step by step and incre-
              mental development of already proven technologies is the norm. It might
              therefore prove substantially more tangible to place the emphasis of a design
              methodology on integration of devices and exiting elemental constituents in
              obtaining a new system. Systematic synthesis as the core of design would
              therefore be affected by what comes “before” and “after” it. Formulation
              and appropriate packaging of design requirements is what comes before
              the synthesis stage and evaluation of a proposed idea is what comes after.
              A methodical and systematic approach to these two parts can provide an
              insurance and a safety net for the multidisciplinary designer. A systematic
              approach to physically realizable solutions requires a solid platform upon
              which all else is built. Modeling based on mathematical isomorphism is
              the natural platform for multidisciplinary specialists to examine the solution
              space. This mode of thought brings the argument back to the invaluable
              potentials of modeling in design. A suitable platform for design through
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25